Second International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'05)
DOI: 10.1109/icac.2005.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation for Autonomic Data Centers using Analytic Performance Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
196
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
196
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We here instead focus on closed systems, where a fixed population of customers cyclically issues requests to the servers; in these models, the problem becomes even more difficult because, besides remaining non-convex, a single evaluation of the objective function is often much more expensive [17,24,38]. This holds because non-iterative expressions for the stationary performance indexes are lacking for multiclass closed models, thus most formulations require to use gradient-hill methods in combination with some model evaluation technique [10,17,24], e.g., approximate mean-value analysis (MVA) [15,33,43]. These formulations are popular in applications [5,16,31,39] but, as we show in the paper, they often fail to converge to a local optimum at the short timescales of minutes at which online capacity management systems operate today.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We here instead focus on closed systems, where a fixed population of customers cyclically issues requests to the servers; in these models, the problem becomes even more difficult because, besides remaining non-convex, a single evaluation of the objective function is often much more expensive [17,24,38]. This holds because non-iterative expressions for the stationary performance indexes are lacking for multiclass closed models, thus most formulations require to use gradient-hill methods in combination with some model evaluation technique [10,17,24], e.g., approximate mean-value analysis (MVA) [15,33,43]. These formulations are popular in applications [5,16,31,39] but, as we show in the paper, they often fail to converge to a local optimum at the short timescales of minutes at which online capacity management systems operate today.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient methods (bs-grad, aql-grad) have been used to establish the competitiveness of approaches that estimate the throughputs X ir by making an external call to an approximate MVA solver. Such approaches are probably the most common in applications [10], together with the basic ut formulation that is equivalent to reasoning based on utilization constraints only. Also, notice that the fpm formulation is immediately related to an open network of M/GI/1 processor sharing queues operating with an average population not greater than N r for each class.…”
Section: Solution Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical models were used for the first time in [24] for predicting performance and exercising QoS control for e-commerce sites [18,24] and for Web servers [25]. Bennani and Menascé used online analytic models for dynamic server allocation in autonomic data centres [2]. Others used the same approach and applied the idea to performance management of cluster-based Web services [16].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a function definition from earlier work on resource allocation in data centers [16] (which generates the curve illustrated in Fig. 2 for a target time of 50):…”
Section: B Utility Functions 1) Utility Based On Response Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have reported the use of utility functions in autonomic computing, typically to support systems management tasks (e.g. [15], [16]); to the best of our understanding this is the first attempt to deploy utility functions for adaptive workflow execution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%