b S Supporting Information
' INTRODUCTIONInterfacial solvation will depend sensitively on a subtle balance of soluteÀsubstrate, soluteÀsolvent, and substrateÀsolvent interactions. Here, the term solvation is used to describe the local environment experienced by a solute. Interfacial solvation has often been described in terms of averaged contributions from the two adjacent phases. 1À6 Such models have proven successful at describing solvation across weakly associating interfaces characterized by large excess free energies. When experimental findings differ from predictions of this "averaged" model of interfacial solvation, results can usually be rationalized in terms of complex solvent structure that reorganizes under the constraint of reduced mobility and strong, directional forces imposed by the surface. 1,5,7À13 These interphase substrateÀsolvent interactions form local domains having properties that do not arise in bulk solution. Only recently have researchers begun to report how more subtle effects such as solute orientation and solute solubility in bulk solution can influence interfacial solvation. 9,14À19 Strongly associating solid/liquid interfaces are characterized by low interfacial energies and strong, directional interactions between the substrate and the solvent. These forces impose longrange structure on the adjacent solvent that can extend several solvent diameters into bulk solution. 17,20À24 The effects of solid surfaces on solvent structure remain an area of active investigation. Fundamental studies attempt to isolate and quantify asymmetric, intermolecular interactions, while empirical investigations parametrize interphase forces between solid substrates and different solvent mixtures to improve chromatographic separations and to tune surface reactivity. 25À33 The affinitiy of a solute for a surface strongly influences adsorption energetics and the resulting environment that a solute samples. In the case of strong soluteÀsubstrate associations, solvent identity may not play a significant role in interfacial solvation. However, if solventÀsubstrate interactions are significantly stronger than those between the solute and substrate, then solute molecules might not accumulate at an interface at all. An example of how these competing energetics affect interfacial phenomena comes from detailed studies of adsorption and retention in chromatographic systems. Wirth and co-workers reported tailing and line broadening in model liquid chromatography measurements and assigned this effect to strong associations between solutes and the silica substrates. 29 They noted that this behavior occurs at both low and neutral pH values with neutral pH values leading to longer retention times and more broadening. Rendering the mobile phase acidic reduces retention time but still results in eluent tailing due to strong adsorption sites on the silica composed of acidic ABSTRACT: Resonance-enhanced second harmonic generation (SHG) spectroscopy was used to probe the electronic structure of p-nitroanisole (pNAs) adsorbed...