1975
DOI: 10.1063/1.430400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant structure in electron impact excitation of CO near threshold

Abstract: Electron impact excitation functions of numerous states in CO have been measured at 45° scattering angle with resolutions of 16–23 meV FWHM. The decay peak of the 10.04 eV resonance can be seen in the results for the a 3Π, a′ 3Σ+, and A 1Π vibrational levels. There was no evidence of resonant excitation of the a′ 3Σ+ state near 8 eV as suggested by Newton and Thomas. Excitation functions of the b 3Σ+, B 1Σ+, C 1Σ+, c 3Π, and E 1Π states, and a previously unobserbed state at 11.26 eV show numerous sharp resonan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Biagi's cross sections are linearly extrapolated in double logarithmic scale, for energies above 100 eV. The small peak in Biagi's cross section near 6.0 eV is due to a resonance structure in the a 3 Π excitation cross section, as measured by Swanson and co-authors [54]. This peak is not present in the other cross sections sets, probably due to the negligible effect it has on the calculated electron transport parameters in pure CO.…”
Section: Electron Impact Cross Sections Sets In Comentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Note that Biagi's cross sections are linearly extrapolated in double logarithmic scale, for energies above 100 eV. The small peak in Biagi's cross section near 6.0 eV is due to a resonance structure in the a 3 Π excitation cross section, as measured by Swanson and co-authors [54]. This peak is not present in the other cross sections sets, probably due to the negligible effect it has on the calculated electron transport parameters in pure CO.…”
Section: Electron Impact Cross Sections Sets In Comentioning
confidence: 63%
“…No changes to the normalization factors could be found which would reduce the discrepancy below this level and it was apparent that it was the electronic excitation cross sections which had to be altered in order to achieve a satisfactory fit to the experimental data. Measurements by Swanson et al (1975) show resonance structure in the a 3 n cross section near threshold. Accordingly we have reduced the a 3 n threshold to 6·01 eV (Krupenie 1966) and incorporated a peak in the cross section near this threshold (see Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of Co Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nonetheless, a small resonance structure is detected just above the threshold, which we attribute to the 2 + Feshbach resonance at 11.29 eV (figure 1). This Feshbach resonance close to the threshold (11.264 eV) of the j 3 + state is probably the reason for the uncertainties in the determination of the excitation energy of this state (Swanson et al 1975, Middleton et al 1993.…”
Section: The J 3 + Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…h Weatherford and Huo (1990). The electronic configuration of this resonance has been taken to be KL1π 4 5σ 3sσ 2 , with the b 3 + state (electronic configuration KL1π 4 5σ 3sσ ) as the parent state (Sanche and Schulz 1972; see also Newman et al 1983, Comer and Read 1971, Swanson et al 1975. state at 10.74 ± 0.02 eV.…”
Section: The 2 + (1004 Ev) Feshbach Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation