2010
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant scattering effect in spectroscopies of interacting atomic gases

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 15) is in contradiction with the expected pseudogap physics at high temperatures [9] but this is a direct consequence of the choice of the ansatz. However, despite this deficit, the ansatz used here is in agreement with experiments that have been used for trying to observe the pseudogap phenomena [53,54].…”
Section: Discussion On the Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…( 15) is in contradiction with the expected pseudogap physics at high temperatures [9] but this is a direct consequence of the choice of the ansatz. However, despite this deficit, the ansatz used here is in agreement with experiments that have been used for trying to observe the pseudogap phenomena [53,54].…”
Section: Discussion On the Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The process described in the diagram C involves dynamics generated by the creation of the hole excitation [38], and it does not influence ground state properties, such as the momentum distribution. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting the final-state effects [29] and using the linear response theory, the current can be expressed as a convolution of the spatially dependent spectral function A(k,ω,r) and the Fermi distribution [13,30] where is the detuning frequency, R F denotes the Thomas-Fermi radius, and corresponds to the tunneling matrix, which we assume as a constant.…”
Section: Effects Of Spatial Inhomogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%