2008
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2008.919212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant Meta-Surface Superstrate for Single and Multifrequency Dipole Antenna Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most serious limitations of the DRAs are its low gain and narrow bandwidth. Recently, various configurations of superstrate were used to enhance the gain of DRAs antennas such as dielectric slabs [4], electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structures [5,6], highly-reflective surfaces [7], and most recently, metamaterial superstrate [8,9]. The bandwidth of DRAs is also limited for single mode operation and this bandwidth is not sufficient for high-rate data transmission in wireless communication systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most serious limitations of the DRAs are its low gain and narrow bandwidth. Recently, various configurations of superstrate were used to enhance the gain of DRAs antennas such as dielectric slabs [4], electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structures [5,6], highly-reflective surfaces [7], and most recently, metamaterial superstrate [8,9]. The bandwidth of DRAs is also limited for single mode operation and this bandwidth is not sufficient for high-rate data transmission in wireless communication systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since artificial electromagnetic (EM) metamaterials (MTMs) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] exhibit properties not commonly encountered in nature, there has been a renewed and actual interest in using the artificial EM MTMs in the design of monopole or dipole antennas [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] antennas, and high-gain or circularly polarized antennas [13][14][15][16]36] over recent years. In general, the monopole or dipole antennas can be classified into three categories according to the operation mechanisms and the loading manners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the miniaturization and band-notch characteristics in an ultrawide operating band can be engineered due to the subwavelength resonance of the loaded elements. The third category is the monopole or dipole antennas built on the left handed (LH) MTM-surface made of periodically arranged LH particles [34,35]. Through this type of loading, the antenna performances are enhanced in terms of not only the radiation behavior but also the impedance matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the mutual coupling of an array of 2 2 2 dipoles has been reduced in 14 dB with the addition of meta-surfaces [8]. Finally, the frequency selective properties of the meta-surfaces can be exploited for the design of highly-isolated multi-frequency antenna arrays [9], [10]. This antenna concept also presents new opportunities in the design of multi-functional antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%