2010
DOI: 10.13182/nse08-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance Parameters and Uncertainties Derived from Epithermal Neutron Capture and Transmission Measurements of Natural Molybdenum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average radiative width γ was not varied since it is well known from the resolved resonance region. Past elemental molybdenum transmission measurements at RPI reported the s-wave strength function for 95 Mo that is in good agreement with the current evaluation [1]. The s-wave strength function is also expected to have a smaller contribution since at around A = 90-100 there is a minimum in the s-wave strength function and a peak (ten times stronger) in the p-wave strength function based on the optical model [5].…”
Section: B Average Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average radiative width γ was not varied since it is well known from the resolved resonance region. Past elemental molybdenum transmission measurements at RPI reported the s-wave strength function for 95 Mo that is in good agreement with the current evaluation [1]. The s-wave strength function is also expected to have a smaller contribution since at around A = 90-100 there is a minimum in the s-wave strength function and a peak (ten times stronger) in the p-wave strength function based on the optical model [5].…”
Section: B Average Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The transmission of neutrons through the material is denoted as T i and is defined as the ratio of background corrected count rate in counts per second with the sample material in the beam to the background corrected rate in the open beam in TOF channel i, is the time-dependent background count rate [1]. Transmission data reduction was performed using the internal processing codes RPIXDR, MONCHK, BACK, FIT, and TRANS.…”
Section: A Data Reduction To Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may note the neutron energies for this comparison, which are quite different from the usual value of 10 keV. These energies are taken from the earlier RIPL-1 compilation [24] except the case of more recent measurements [26,[36][37][38]. Nevertheless, these changes have no importance for the σ T (E) values around 1 MeV, which are of obvious importance for the competition between the neutron and chargedparticle decay of excited CN, in heavier Mo nuclei.…”
Section: A Compound and Pre-equilibrium Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of experimental[22,26,[36][37][38] and calculated s-and p-wave neutron strength functions S0 and S1, respectively, and the potential scattering radius R ′ [22] of93 Nb and92,[94][95][96][97][98]100 Mo isotopes, and the changes of either local or global real-potential depth v1 of the even and odd Mo isotopes[33], respectively (with the use of[33] notations, the energies are in MeV and geometry parameters in fm) which provide the best results within the SPRT method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%