2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2017)159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance enhancement of dark matter interactions: the case for early kinetic decoupling and velocity dependent resonance width

Abstract: Motivated by the possibility of enhancing dark matter (DM) self-interaction cross-section σ self , we have revisited the issue of DM annihilation through a Breit-Wigner resonance. In this case thermally averaged annihilation cross-section has strong temperature dependence, whereas elastic scattering of DM on the thermal bath particles is suppressed. This leads to the early kinetic decoupling of DM and an interesting interplay in the evolution of DM density and temperature that can be described by a set of coup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirement that the thermal relic density be equal to the observed value Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001 [98] provides a very strong constraint on the model. For an accurate determination of the theoretical prediction matching the precision of measurements, we use the treatment first introduced in [99] and extended to the early kinetic decoupling regime in [76,77], based on solving the coupled system of Boltzmann equations (cBE) for the number density and the second moment of the phase space distribution. 2 Whenever the kinetic decoupling happens significantly later than chemical one we use the micrOMEGAs 5.0 [86] to calculate relic density.…”
Section: Relic Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The requirement that the thermal relic density be equal to the observed value Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001 [98] provides a very strong constraint on the model. For an accurate determination of the theoretical prediction matching the precision of measurements, we use the treatment first introduced in [99] and extended to the early kinetic decoupling regime in [76,77], based on solving the coupled system of Boltzmann equations (cBE) for the number density and the second moment of the phase space distribution. 2 Whenever the kinetic decoupling happens significantly later than chemical one we use the micrOMEGAs 5.0 [86] to calculate relic density.…”
Section: Relic Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the latter are enhanced (e.g., by a resonance), or in general when scattering processes are unrelated to the number changing ones (as is the case of semi-annihilation) there is no reason to expect that this standard assumption is satisfied. Indeed, it has been shown recently [76] (see also [77]) that kinetic decoupling can get under way as early as the chemical one and the subsequent change of the shape of the DM phase space distribution can modify the relic abundance by even more than an order of magnitude. In fact, the concrete example that is given in [76] is the case of Z 2 scalar singlet dark matter around the Higgs resonance, which finds its clear analogue in the Higgs resonance region of the Z 3 singlet DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular DM scenario [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] is based on the working hypothesis that there exists a mediator with couplings to both DM and SM particles, and whose mass happens to be approximately twice that of the DM. In such scenarios, one has to consider DM annihilation processes at energies where the tree-level propagator of the mediator becomes singular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the BR inv can exclude points with m χ > m h /2, because the Higgs boson can decay invisibly also to two h 2 if it is light enough. Early kinetic decoupling [92,93] may additionally enhance BR inv several times [31], but in practice this would not change the parameter space of GW signals. In particular, all our points with a potentially measurable GW signal have m χ , m 2 > m h /2.…”
Section: Direct Detection and Gravitational Wave Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%