Resonance beyond regimes: Migrant’s alternative infrastructuring practices in Athens

Abstract

In migration studies, there is an increasing interest in understanding how migration processes are shaped by different forms of brokerage and mediation. We relate these debates to the everyday struggles of migrants in the city of Athens. In so doing, we propose a shift from the all-encompassing view on infrastructures, that is, as systematic entities of facilitation/control to the infrastructuring practices of migrants. This implies a focus on how migrants create dynamic social platforms, and how these platforms relate to formal infrastructures and industries. We analyse these infrastructuring practices through a conceptual lens of resonance that is sensitive to the constitutive (how things, people and processes are brought together) as well as travelling capacities of these practices (how the platforms shift to other places). With an ethnographic approach, we create in-depth insights into the ways in which migrants mediate im/mobility in the urban environment of Athens through infrastructuring practices. The paper concludes by reflecting on the promises and limitations of the infrastructuring practices as sites of solidarity. We thereby argue that there are many links to make within the mobile commons debate. At the same time, our findings highlight that the transformative potential of infrastructuring practices does not always go along with a clear claim on solidarity.

Counter moves. Destabilizing the grand narrative of onward migration and secondary movements in Europe

“…He went to Switzerland, where he stayed with some friend he met en route in Morocco. The travel connections people create produce a floating topography (Simone, 2019) or alternative migration infrastructure (Wajsberg and Schapendonk, 2021) that facilitates peoples movements within (or rather beyond) stringent mobility regimes. Some “try their luck” elsewhere in terms of labour opportunities or institutional protection, others try to fulfil a social script of seeing places.…”

Introduction: the production of irregular migration

“…al. 2015) and alternative infrastructures (Wajsberg and Schapendonk 2021) that transgress the controlling power of migration apparatuses. Following this line of thought, it is argued that despite the hard border walls, the deathly necropolitics (Mbembe 2003), humanitarian dramas and the billions spent on securitization, irregular migratory movements continue to reflect an unruly "stubbornness" (Stierl 2017).…”

Research Handbook on Irregular Migration

“…It shows the coming-togetherness of these actors with their overlapping roles, possibly conflicting objectives and opaque boundaries. Given its potential to introduce insights from a wide range of academic disciplines that focus on (the inner workings of) these infrastructural dimensions, the migration-infrastructures approach is considered promising (Collins 2021, Wajsberg andSchapendonk 2021). As there is an increasing number of empirical studies that draw upon this perspective to explain unauthorized migrants' clandestine journeys (e.g.…”