2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, on one hand, research on infant cognition has revealed that 3.5-to-5-months-old infants readily expect objects to continue to exist when occluded [9][10][11][12] , 4.5-to-6.5-month-old infants are sensitive to spatiotemporal properties of causal collision events 36,37 and 3.5-to-5-month-old infants expect objects to not pass through each other [9][10][11][12] . On the other hand, research on adult vision has shown that the visual system can represent dynamic objects moving through occlusion 8,38 , is tuned to Newtonian mechanics in causal collision events 6,[39][40][41][42] (and unsurprisingly other physical regularities that go beyond the infant repertoire such as balance 7,43 , friction 44 and so on). Therefore, object solidity constitutes a missing piece in the diverse landscape of physical expectations underlying adult vision: Despite being a basic physical law of our world and emerging early in infant cognition, solidity is yet to be shown to operate in adult vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, on one hand, research on infant cognition has revealed that 3.5-to-5-months-old infants readily expect objects to continue to exist when occluded [9][10][11][12] , 4.5-to-6.5-month-old infants are sensitive to spatiotemporal properties of causal collision events 36,37 and 3.5-to-5-month-old infants expect objects to not pass through each other [9][10][11][12] . On the other hand, research on adult vision has shown that the visual system can represent dynamic objects moving through occlusion 8,38 , is tuned to Newtonian mechanics in causal collision events 6,[39][40][41][42] (and unsurprisingly other physical regularities that go beyond the infant repertoire such as balance 7,43 , friction 44 and so on). Therefore, object solidity constitutes a missing piece in the diverse landscape of physical expectations underlying adult vision: Despite being a basic physical law of our world and emerging early in infant cognition, solidity is yet to be shown to operate in adult vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activations observed in early visual and parietal regions overlap with areas that have been shown to process occluded motion (Ban et al, 2013 ; Erlikhman & Caplovitz, 2017 ; Olson et al, 2004 ; Shuwairi et al, 2007 ). These regions are thought to keep track of a moving object's position through perceptual gaps by retaining information about its direction and speed prior to the occlusion and using this information to predict the time and location of its reappearance (Teichmann et al, 2021 ). Moreover, the identified activity in the dorsal premotor cortex, superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus and early visual areas (spanning over V1, V2 and V3) is consistent with regions that are typically involved in visual imagery (Winlove et al, 2018 ), and that have previously been shown to be involved in intuitive physical inference (Fischer et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, all occlusions are treated alike regardless of their duration ( object recovery ). People employ mechanisms similar to those employed for brief occlusions (Teichmann et al, 2021), relying on motion information and extrapolating objects’ future locations or alternatively relying on proximity cues (Franconeri et al, 2012; Horowitz et al, 2006; Scholl & Pylyshyn, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%