2004
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2004.1362545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the fairness issue in bus-based optical access networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed in [4] that even if the traffic sourced by upstream nodes, which is regulated by the TB shaper, does not violate the negotiated throughput, it causes unacceptable packet delay to downstream nodes sharing the same channel. Certainly, thanks to TB algorithm the free bandwidth (stated in bit/s) allocated to each node is theoretically sufficient to handle its traffic.…”
Section: The Proposed Protocol: Tcardmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We showed in [4] that even if the traffic sourced by upstream nodes, which is regulated by the TB shaper, does not violate the negotiated throughput, it causes unacceptable packet delay to downstream nodes sharing the same channel. Certainly, thanks to TB algorithm the free bandwidth (stated in bit/s) allocated to each node is theoretically sufficient to handle its traffic.…”
Section: The Proposed Protocol: Tcardmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, as demonstrated in [4], this same mechanism presents several limitations when dealing with the fairness problem in the case of asynchronous transmission.…”
Section: The Proposed Protocol: Tcardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [13, 14, 15 and 16], authors have presented performance analysis of OPS bus-based networks employing optical CSMA/CA protocol (e.g., the DBORN architecture [2]). Using Jaiswal's [17] and Takagi's [18] results on M/G/1 priority queues, the authors derive mean packet delay at each node for both slotted [13,14,15] and unslotted [14,15,16] modes, which support both fixed and variable length packets. In particular, both [15] and [16] use the same approach to derive the upper and lower bounds of the packet delay at downstream nodes on the unslotted bus-based network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%