2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl086908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the Differences in the Simulated and Reconstructed Temperature Response to Volcanism

Abstract: Explosive volcanism imposes impulse-like radiative forcing on the climate system, providing a natural experiment to study the climate response to perturbation. Previous studies have identified disagreements between paleoclimate reconstructions and climate model simulations with respect to the magnitude and recovery from volcanic cooling, questioning the fidelity of climate model simulations, reconstructions, or both. Using the paleoenvironmental data assimilation framework of the Last Millennium Reanalysis, th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(168 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal information revealed by QWA can also be incorporated directly in proxy systems modeling within data assimilation approaches to climate field reconstruction (Tardif et al., 2019). Previous mismatches between modeled volcanic forcing and proxy observations have been traced in part to the type of proxy data used (Esper et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2020). MXD is still considered the most appropriate proxy to detect volcanic cooling signals and provides the most robust temperature reconstructions, but calibration of the proxy with the instrumental record necessarily assumes that it directly or indirectly reflects temperatures integrated over the entire summer or extended growing season.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The seasonal information revealed by QWA can also be incorporated directly in proxy systems modeling within data assimilation approaches to climate field reconstruction (Tardif et al., 2019). Previous mismatches between modeled volcanic forcing and proxy observations have been traced in part to the type of proxy data used (Esper et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2020). MXD is still considered the most appropriate proxy to detect volcanic cooling signals and provides the most robust temperature reconstructions, but calibration of the proxy with the instrumental record necessarily assumes that it directly or indirectly reflects temperatures integrated over the entire summer or extended growing season.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the Laki eruption, which began in June, MXD reconstructions probably overestimate the duration and magnitude of the cooling over northern Alaska when calibrated against average summer temperatures. Beyond improving spatial coverage of MXD networks (K. J. Anchukaitis et al., 2017; Esper et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2020), a better understanding of the growth‐environment relationship is needed to understand how trees as proxies record volcanic forcing. QWA provides a valuable new tool for more precisely quantifying the timing and magnitude of the climate response to volcanism, and long continuous QWA chronologies could help support more accurate reconstructions of last millennium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…compare the PHYDA to another new and publicly available data assimilation product, the Last Millennium Reanalysis product (LMR) (Tardif et al, 2019), which was recently used to investigate disagreements between model and proxy estimates of global temperature responses to volcanism (Zhu et al, 2020). These two state-of-the-art data assimilation products, which provide global representations of volcanic responses, are compared to simulations from the NCAR CESM-LME, which served as the prior for the PHYDA.…”
Section: 1029/2020pa004128mentioning
confidence: 99%