Resolving paradoxes in IT success through IT ambidexterity: The moderating role of uncertain environments

Syed, Tahir Abbas; Blome, Constantin; Παπαδόπουλος, Θάνος

doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103345

Cited by 37 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior studies have measured the ambidexterity ( Junni et al, 2013 ; Salvador et al, 2014 ; Zhao et al, 2021 ; Syed et al, 2020 ). Chandrasekaran et al (2012) reported that both decision risk and alignment capabilities imitate ambidexterity proficiency at the firm level.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Venugopal et al (2020) revealed organizational ambidexterity is considerably affected by the top management team behavioral integration and their innovation practical choices. Syed et el. (2020) resolved the information technology ambidexterity inconsistencies and proposed that firms control these inconsistencies to develop their ambidexterity capability.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sustainable production and consumption complex transformations is requiring firms to instantaneously push them to change from traditional operation to incrementally increasing to a more disruptive adaptation approach ( Gualandris et al, 2018 ). The organizational ambidexterity is argued to be capable for firms to efficiently control current business demands while fundamentally being adaptive to changes to develop the sustainable SC systems ( Hajli et al, 2020 ; Gomes et al, 2020 ; Parast, 2020 ; Syed et al, 2020 ; Yu et al, 2019 ). Firms must decide interpreting with most beneficial relationships to recovery in the face of disruption and difficulty.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Bui

Tsai

Tseng

et al. 2021

Sustainable Production and Consumption

177

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Balancing sustainability and disruption of supply chains requires organizational ambidexterity. Sustainable supply chains prioritize efficiency and economies of scale and may not have sufficient redundancy to withstand disruptive events. There is a developing body of literature that attempts to reconcile these two aspects. This study gives a data-driven literature review of sustainable supply chain management trends toward ambidexterity and disruption. The critical review reveals temporal trends and geographic distribution of literature. A hybrid of data-driven analysis approach based on content and bibliometric analyses, fuzzy Delphi method, entropy weight method, and fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory is used on 273 keywords and 22 indicators obtained based on the experts’ evaluation. The most important indicators are identified as supply chain agility, supply chain coordination, supply chain finance, supply chain flexibility, supply chain resilience, and sustainability. The regions show different tendencies compared with others. Asia and Oceania, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Africa are the regions needs improvement, while Europe and North America show distinct apprehensions on supply chain network design. The main contribution of this review is the identification of the knowledge frontier, which then leads to a discussion of prospects for future studies and practical industry implementation.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Bui

Tsai

Tseng

et al. 2021

Sustainable Production and Consumption

177

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In today’s ambiguous business environment, organizations need to be particularly attentive to achieve the desired operational performance. Environmental uncertainty arises from the changing landscape of competition, consumer preferences, globalization and increased focus on innovation (Syed et al, 2020 ; Yayla & Hu, 2012 ). Companies respond to this environmental uncertainty by adopting a variety of approaches and orientations to ensure their competitiveness and the desired level of operational performance (Liu et al, 2019 ; McLaren et al, 2011 ; Teo & Pian, 2003 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationship between Analytics Capability of an Organization (ACO) and both Supply Chain Disruption Orientation (SCDO) and Supply Chain Resilience (SCR) in order to achieve adequate operational performance in an era of environmental uncertainty is carried out in this study. Total three hypotheses (seven sub-hypotheses) using a survey of 405 respondents are collected via a pre-tested instrument and tested further. Results indicated the influence of ACO on both SCDO and SCR to achieve the desired degree of operational performance. However, under the moderation of environmental uncertainty, the link between ACO and SCDO was not supported, although the link between ACO and SCR was supported and this further enhanced operational performance. Further investigation of unsupported hypotheses using statistical analysis was conducted to gain deeper insights. It is explained how ACO impacted dynamic capabilities to influence operational performance. The contribution to theory of this study lies in explaining the role of dynamic capabilities that emerge from analytics as compared to the traditional view of supply chain classification. Further, the influence of environmental uncertainty on positioning dynamic capabilities strategically to address disruption in supply chains is discussed in the present study.

show abstract

“…Products, processes, service design and modification show the value of adjusted innovation initiatives, whereby SMEs may either face crises or uncertainties aiming long time survival (Syed et al , 2020). Central to this viewpoint is the assumption that supporting regulatory frameworks for innovation based on sustainable business outcomes are created by combining complementary knowledge, and that this combination phase occurs most frequently through alliances and collaborations between multiple actors (Somaya et al , 2007).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The intervention of strategic innovation practices in between regulations and sustainable business growth: a holistic perspective for Malaysian SMEs

Islam

Wahab

2021

WJEMSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeSMEs that manage more sustainability focused initiatives into their core business strategy can possibly benefit from lower expenses, reduced threats and new business opportunities, but in Malaysia most of the SMEs are still far off in terms of adapting to a sustainable business growth outline from a holistic point of view. Hence, this study aims to serve deeper understanding about a strategic innovation focused sustainable growth model on basis of multidisciplinary QBL-QHIM theoretical perspectives where strategic innovation practices intervene in between desired growth and government support (regulations).Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual investigation embraces a newly emerged concern of sustainable business growth in SMEs, considering ranges of literature reviews from the disciplines of management and entrepreneurship. The study also systematically explores the concepts of regulations, strategic innovation practices on basis of QBL and QHIM theories to adjust the sustainable business growth model from a holistic angle.FindingsThe outcomes show that multidisciplinary QBL-QHIM conjunction within the interrelationships of the selected constructs holds the potential for innovation focused business growth in a more sustainable, comprehensive and holistic manner. The study also detects that exploitative-explorative innovation practices can possibly mediate in between suitable regulations and sustainable business growth of SMEs, considering supportive external environment.Research limitations/implicationsResearches are encouraged to test the proposed model.Practical implicationsThe study indicates a conceptual configuration for policy makers as well as entrepreneurs to ensure sustainable business growth for SMEs. The outcomes of the study also provide useful direction on decision-making process of owner or manager considering social, economic, environmental and spiritual aspects of daily operations.Social implicationsThe conceptual model may possibly able to generate more social values, considering a holistic angle into business activities.Originality/valueThe conceptualization is a unique attempt, considering developing regions to extend the current understanding of strategic innovation focused sustainable growth process of SMEs from a holistic angle.

show abstract

Resolving paradoxes in IT success through IT ambidexterity: The moderating role of uncertain environments

Cited by 37 publications

References 84 publications

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty

The intervention of strategic innovation practices in between regulations and sustainable business growth: a holistic perspective for Malaysian SMEs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About