2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving mechanisms of toxicity while pursuing ecotoxicological relevance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This need is well met by the use of histopathology. This idea is in line with the need to relate the responses of individuals to the responses of populations and communities (Hinton et al, 2005). Measuring the relative changes of biomarkers in response to environmental and contaminant-related variables will help define the breadth of physiologic changes that can be anticipated in response to specific contaminants.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This need is well met by the use of histopathology. This idea is in line with the need to relate the responses of individuals to the responses of populations and communities (Hinton et al, 2005). Measuring the relative changes of biomarkers in response to environmental and contaminant-related variables will help define the breadth of physiologic changes that can be anticipated in response to specific contaminants.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the context of guiding species recovery, management decisions are typically made at the scale of populations. Resolving issues of scale is a central challenge in ecotoxicology, and it extends beyond salmon to at-risk aquatic populations, communities, and ecosystems worldwide (Eggen et al 2004, Hinton et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Gourmelon and Ahtiainen (2006), full validation by the OECD requires testing of coded compounds, including positive and negative controls (examples are provided in Table 3), for the assessment of inter-laboratory reproducibility (using a minimum of three laboratories per species). Based on current information, for example, biomarkers on endocrine disruption may be used to guide aquatic species selection, inform efficient chronic test design and concentration selection and help with in vitro and in vivo in read across between chemicals within the same class (Hutchinson 2002;Hinton et al 2005;Hutchinson et al 2006a). Compared with mammals, amphibians and fish (OECD meeting of the Endocrine Disrupters Task Force, April 2006), the development and validation of endocrine-related biomarkers for invertebrates has great potential.…”
Section: Research Recommendation 3-validation Of Mechanistic Biomarkementioning
confidence: 99%