2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.16.908988
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving mechanisms of immune-mediated disease in primary CD4 T cells

Abstract: Deriving mechanisms of immune-mediated disease from GWAS data remains a formidable challenge, with attempts to identify causal variants being frequently hampered by linkage disequilibrium. To determine whether causal variants could be identified via their functional effects, we adapted a massively-parallel reporter assay for use in primary CD4 T-cells, key effectors of many immune-mediated diseases. Using the results to guide further study, we provide a generalisable framework for resolving disease mechanisms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…luciferase) assays are used to assess the regulatory impact of candidate DNA regions, such as those harboring candidate SNPs. This can be performed in a high-throughput manner as part of massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) and has recently been optimized for use in primary T-helper cells ( 52 ). This technique was applied to 14 autoimmune loci, in rested and stimulated primary T-helper cells, identifying SNPs which had the greatest impact on regulatory activity.…”
Section: Experimental Characterization Of Individual Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…luciferase) assays are used to assess the regulatory impact of candidate DNA regions, such as those harboring candidate SNPs. This can be performed in a high-throughput manner as part of massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) and has recently been optimized for use in primary T-helper cells ( 52 ). This technique was applied to 14 autoimmune loci, in rested and stimulated primary T-helper cells, identifying SNPs which had the greatest impact on regulatory activity.…”
Section: Experimental Characterization Of Individual Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aforementioned study, Cas9 was targeted to multiple locations within close proximity of rs6927172 in primary T-helper cells, giving rise to a heterogeneous combination of deletions and other edits. Edited cells had reduced TNFAIP3 expression, with no change in five other neighboring genes ( 52 ). A similar approach was applied separately in HEK293 cells, generating clonally derived lines with specific deletions of 11/12 bp including rs6927172.…”
Section: Experimental Characterization Of Individual Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of these activities is highlighted by the fact that more than 80% of GWAS-identified polymorphisms associated with disease fall within regulatory elements (Giral et al, 2018;Maurano et al, 2012;Visel et al, 2009). To understand how such non-coding variants cause disease (a primary goal of translational research), several strategies are currently being implemented, including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) enrichment methods (Cano-Gamez and Trynka, 2020), the statistical colocalization of variants to eQTLs (Giambartolomei et al, 2014), and genome-wide CRISPR screens (Bourges et al, 2020;Kampmann, 2020). Although these techniques are powerful, a full understanding of the variant-to-function problem will require the deciphering of the cis-regulatory code (Jindal and Farley, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivery of a library of DNA elements to cells, followed by RNA collection and sequencing, enables quantitative estimation of the expression driven by each element as a ratio of collected RNA barcode to delivered DNA barcode. These assays have recently been adapted to systematically identify SNPs with functional allelic TR differences from GWAS loci for several diseases [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] . Two key features make MPRAs advantageous for identifying both functional SNPs and their TR interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%