Resolving Electron Mass Inconsistency Using Negative Mass

Young, Arlen

doi:10.4236/jmp.2022.139077

Cited by 2 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ratios of the charge and mass attributes for the electron model were calculated in [1] assuming a fixed and uniform surface charge, and are summarized in Table 3. It is interesting to note that all of these ratios are nearly equal to the inverse of the Fine Structure Constant, with differences of less than 15%.…”

Section: Journal Of Modern Physicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reference [1] addresses a great inconsistency between the measured electron spin magnetic dipole moment and the moment calculated from spinning the electron charge. It also addresses a similar inconsistency between the spin angular momentum derived from quantum theory and the classical momentum calculated from spinning the electron mass.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It also addresses a similar inconsistency between the spin angular momentum derived from quantum theory and the classical momentum calculated from spinning the electron mass. The model presented in [1] is referred to herein as the dual-charge dual-mass (DCDM) model. The internal attributes for the model were calculated for both ring and spherical shapes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Electron Shape Calculated for the Dual-Charge Dual-Mass Model

Young¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A model for the internal structure of the electron using classical physics equations has been previously published by the author. The model employs both positive and negative charges and positive and negative masses. The internal attributes of the electron structure were calculated for both ring and spherical shapes. Further examination of the model reveals an instability for the ring shape. The spherical shape appears to be stable, but relies on tensile or compressive forces of the electron material for stability. The model is modified in this document to eliminate the dependency on material forces. Uniform stability is provided solely by balancing electrical and centrifugal forces. This stability is achieved by slightly elongating the sphere along the spin axis to create a prolate ellipsoid. The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid is the spin axis of the electron, and is calculated to be 1.20% longer than the semi-minor axis, which is the radius of the equator. Although the shape deviates slightly from a perfect sphere, the electric dipole moment is zero. In the author's previously published document, the attributes of the internal components of the electron, such as charge and mass, were calculated and expressed as ratios to the classically measured values for the composite electron. It is interesting to note that all of these ratios are nearly the same as the inverse of the Fine Structure Constant, with differences of less than 15%. The electron model assumed that the outer surface charge was fixed and uniform. By allowing the charge to be mobile and the shape to have a particular ellipticity, it is shown that the calculated charge and mass ratios for the model can be exactly equal to the Fine Structure Constant and the Constant plus one. The electron radius predicted by the model is 15% greater than the Classical Electron Radius.

show abstract

Section: Journal Of Modern Physicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electron Shape Calculated for the Dual-Charge Dual-Mass Model

Young¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The author calculated in [13] that the shape is a prolate spheroid. In the author's previous publications [1] [13] [14], a basic assumption was that the physical and electrical forces exactly balance out at the equator of the electron surface. The results were radii that were somewhat greater than the classical electron radius.…”

Section: Electron Shapementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The author has previously published a proposed model of the electron [1] which resolves large inconsistencies between the measured mass of the electron and the mass calculated from the spin angular momentum, and also between the measured charge of the electron and the charge derived from the magnetic dipole moment. The model introduces a positive charge and negative mass into the electron core and predicts the electron radius.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Electron Model Based on the Fine Structure Constant

Young¹

2023

JMP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In previous publications, the author has proposed a model of the electron's internal structure, wherein a positively-charged negative mass outer shell and a negatively-charged positive mass central core are proposed to resolve the electron's charge and mass inconsistencies. That model is modified in this document by assuming the electron's radius is exactly equal to the classical electron radius. The attributes of the internal components of the electron's structure have been recalculated accordingly. The shape of the electron is also predicted, and found to be slightly aspherical on the order of an oblate ellipsoid. This shape is attributed to centrifugal force and compliant outer shell material. It is interesting to note that all of the electron's attributes, both external and internal, with the exception of mass and angular moment, are functions of the fine structure constant α , and can be calculated from just three additional constants: electron mass, Planck's constant, and speed of light. In particular, the ratios of the outer shell charge and mass to the electron charge and mass, respectively, are 3 2α . The ratios of the central core charge and mass to the electron charge and mass, respectively, areAttributes of the electron are compared with those of the muon. Charge and spin angular momentum are the same, while mass, magnetic moment, and radius appear to be related by the fine structure constant. The mass of the electron outer shell is nearly equal to the mass of the muon. The muon internal structure can be modeled exactly the same as for the electron, with exactly the same attribute relationships.

show abstract

Resolving Electron Mass Inconsistency Using Negative Mass

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Electron Shape Calculated for the Dual-Charge Dual-Mass Model

Electron Shape Calculated for the Dual-Charge Dual-Mass Model

An Electron Model Based on the Fine Structure Constant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About