Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting <i>Ne Bis in Idem</i> in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity

Coffey, Ger

doi:10.1177/203228441300400105

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dengan demikian, asas ne bis in idem dipandang sebagai bagian dari asas komplementer (Coffey, 2013). Contohnya bisa ditemukan dalam Pasal 20 Ayat 3 Statuta Roma MPI.…”

Section: Asas Ne Bis In Idemunclassified

Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Putri

2022

Masalah Masalah Hukum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Menurut asas subsider, yurisdiksi universal hanya dapat dilaksanakan sebagai upaya terakhir. Artikel ini berpendapat bahwa asas tersebut perlu diatur dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sebagai syarat untuk melaksanakan yurisdiksi universal berdasarkan Pasal 6 dan 7 agar dapat menjaga penghormatan terhadap kedaulatan negara lain dan menghindari resiko lainnya yang muncul dari pelaksanaan yurisdiksi universal. Artikel ini menyampaikan gagasan Penulis tentang bagaimana asas tersebut dapat dikonseptualisasikan dalam RKUHP. Kesimpulan Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep asas subsider bisa dibentuk dengan lima syarat yaitu, pemenuhan asas ‘universality plus’ dan ‘conditional universality’; adanya laporan dugaan kasus kejahatan internasional; Indonesia sebagai custodial state; dan asas ne bis in idem. Kelima syarat tersebut yang kemudian bisa menjadikan yurisdiksi universal sebagai upaya terakhir.

show abstract

“…Dengan demikian, asas ne bis in idem dipandang sebagai bagian dari asas komplementer (Coffey, 2013). Contohnya bisa ditemukan dalam Pasal 20 Ayat 3 Statuta Roma MPI.…”

Section: Asas Ne Bis In Idemunclassified

Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Putri

2022

Masalah Masalah Hukum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been enshrined in several legal instruments [8], most notably in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which guarantees the right not to be prosecuted or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same offence [9]. Additionally, it finds expression in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which has consistently upheld and interpreted the principle in the context of EU law [10]. In that regard, several requirements should be satisfied for a situation to be considered a bis in idem.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Ne Bis in Idem principle: Material scope and application in EU law

Moses Atem Besong

2024

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines and analyses the application of the ne bis in idem principle based on a final verdict of acquittal or conviction by a competent court where the cases have already been concluded by a final decision. It examines the principle concerning Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 4P7 ECHR), Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and its implication under Articles 54 to 58 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA). By reviewing previous literature, case law and fact sheets of the Court of Justice on the Ne bis in idem principle, the paper analyses the material scope of application of the principle and highlights the multifaceted significance of the Ne Bis in idem principle in criminal proceedings and the harmonisation of legal practices within the European Union. It reaffirms the principle's foundational importance in fostering fairness, legal certainty, and the protection of fundamental rights across a wide array of legal contexts. It elaborates and provides an interpretative analysis of the principle on the associated jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The paper also shows that the ne bis in idem principle serves as a common ground for judicial cooperation in criminal matters and mutual recognition of the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA concerning the European Arrest Warrant (‘EAW FD’) and Directive 2014/41/EU regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters.

show abstract

The Decision to Drop the Case: Res Iudicata or Transfer of Competence?

Caianiello

2018

Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in Conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Exploring the Ne Bis in Idem principle: Material scope and application in EU law

The Decision to Drop the Case: Res Iudicata or Transfer of Competence?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About