1999
DOI: 10.21236/ada394246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving Conflict Over Reservoir Operation. A Role for Optimization and Simulation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prioritize the order in which different reservoirs fill and draw down, the associated unit costs would be established according to the desired ranking, with the reservoir to be emptied last (highest priority storage) having the largest penalty. Storage penalties within the same reservoir are represented by a piecewise linear penalty function (Kirby 1994).…”
Section: Rule 5: Storage Versus Storage Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prioritize the order in which different reservoirs fill and draw down, the associated unit costs would be established according to the desired ranking, with the reservoir to be emptied last (highest priority storage) having the largest penalty. Storage penalties within the same reservoir are represented by a piecewise linear penalty function (Kirby 1994).…”
Section: Rule 5: Storage Versus Storage Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate this process, methods to determine optimal changes based on a project purpose framework (e.g. hydropower, flood risk, and recreation) are becoming more common in the literature as the demand on water resources increases (Wurbs 1991, Kirby 1999, Labadie 2004, Rani and Moreira 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%