2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr03608a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving ambiguities in nanowire field-effect transistor characterization

Abstract: We have modeled InAs nanowires using finite element methods considering the actual device geometry, the semiconducting nature of the channel and surface states, providing a comprehensive picture of charge distribution and gate action. The effective electrostatic gate width and screening effects are taken into account. A pivotal aspect is that the gate coupling to the nanowire is compromised by the concurrent coupling of the gate electrode to the surface/interface states, which provide the vast majority of carr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(74 reference statements)
11
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24,25]. Crucially, because the 2DEG is highly exposed to the surface, the charge distribution and thereby conduction can also be influenced by charged species adsorbed to the outside surface of the nanowire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[24,25]. Crucially, because the 2DEG is highly exposed to the surface, the charge distribution and thereby conduction can also be influenced by charged species adsorbed to the outside surface of the nanowire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(b). It is formed by surface-state-induced band-bending, which pins the surface Fermi energy near the conduction band edge [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the experimental setup of Ref. [30], we consider a length of the nanowire of L = 2.18 μm and a radius of R = 47.5 nm. Moreover, we use the field-effect mobility μ = 600 cm 2 V −1 s −1 and the 3D electron density n 3D = 5 × 10 18 cm −3 .…”
Section: Experimental Data Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, one is able to effectively control the size, morphology, potential landscape, carrier, and impurity concentration, or even crystal structure [12,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Since typically both the SOC and the WAL/WL correction strongly depend on these characteristics, the great diversity makes it difficult to build up a general theoretical description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation