1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02392446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolvent of the Laplacian on strictly pseudoconvex domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
161
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractional CR covariant operators of order 2γ, γ ∈ R, may be defined from scattering theory on a Kähler-Einstein manifold X [21,45,40,33], they are pseudodifferential operators whose principal symbol agrees with the pure fractional powers of the CR sub-Laplacian (−∆ b ) γ on the boundary M = ∂X . In the particular case of the Heisenberg group H n , they are simply the intertwining operators on the CR sphere calculated in [8,51,9] using classical representation theory tools.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fractional CR covariant operators of order 2γ, γ ∈ R, may be defined from scattering theory on a Kähler-Einstein manifold X [21,45,40,33], they are pseudodifferential operators whose principal symbol agrees with the pure fractional powers of the CR sub-Laplacian (−∆ b ) γ on the boundary M = ∂X . In the particular case of the Heisenberg group H n , they are simply the intertwining operators on the CR sphere calculated in [8,51,9] using classical representation theory tools.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we consider the Θ-structures introduced by Epstein-Melrose-Mendoza [21]. We will only give brief description and we refer the interested reader to the detailed description in [40].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simultaneously, the infinity of such manifolds, that is the spherical CauchyRiemannian manifolds furnish the simplest examples of manifolds with contact structures. Second, such manifolds provide simplest examples of negatively curved manifolds not having constant sectional curvature, and already obtained results show surprising differences between geometry and topology of such manifolds and corresponding properties of (real hyperbolic) manifolds with constant negative curvature, see [BS,BuM,EMM,Go1,GM,Min,Yu1]. Third, such manifolds occupy a remarkable place among rank-one symmetric spaces in the sense of their deformations: they enjoy the flexibility of low dimensional real hyperbolic manifolds (see [Th,A1,A2] and §7) as well as the rigidity of quaternionic/octionic hyperbolic manifolds and higher-rank locally symmetric spaces [MG1,Co2,P].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%