2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00023-011-0108-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolvent Estimates for Normally Hyperbolic Trapped Sets

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
175
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vasy [50] has recently obtained a microlocal description of the scattering resolvent and in particular recovered the results of [26,27] on meromorphy of the resolvent and exponential decay; see [50,Appendix] for how his work relates to [26]. The crucial component for obtaining exponential decay was the work of WunschZworski [52] on resolvent estimates for normally hyperbolic trapping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Vasy [50] has recently obtained a microlocal description of the scattering resolvent and in particular recovered the results of [26,27] on meromorphy of the resolvent and exponential decay; see [50,Appendix] for how his work relates to [26]. The crucial component for obtaining exponential decay was the work of WunschZworski [52] on resolvent estimates for normally hyperbolic trapping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We remark that, in the setting of [21,30], (1.2) holds with C 0 h −k replaced by C 0 (log h −1 )h −1 , and so the improvement in our result is only of a factor of log(1/h). On the other hand, in [1], Bony, Burq and Ramond prove that for P a semiclassical Schrödinger operator on R n , the presence of a single trapped trajectory implies that…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[23] for an example and [1] for a recent introduction to the subject of semiclassical resolvent estimates). Nonetheless, (1.2) is satisfied for many hyperbolic trapped geometries, including those studied in [21,30]. See [12,Theorem 6.1] for (1.2) in the asymptotically hyperbolic case, and see [11] and [30,Corollary 1] for the asymptotically conic case.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations