2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolved star formation in the metal-poor star-forming region Magellanic Bridge C

Abstract: Magellanic Bridge C (MB-C) is a metal-poor (∼1/5 Z⊙) low-density star-forming region located 59 kpc away in the Magellanic Bridge, offering a resolved view of the star formation process in conditions different to the Galaxy. From Atacama Large Millimetre Array CO (1-0) observations, we detect molecular clumps associated to candidate young stellar objects (YSOs), pre-main sequence (PMS) stars, and filamentary structure identified in far-infrared imaging. YSOs and PMS stars form in molecular gas having densities… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular clouds with radii 0.3−1 pc, velocity FWHM 1−2 km s −1 and CO luminosities 10−100 K km s −1 pc 2 have been found in Magellanic Bridge B (Saldaño et al 2018). Magellanic Bridge C 12 CO(1−0) emission is concentrated in clouds with radii 0.9−1.5 pc and velocity FWHM 0.5−1.4 km s −1 (Kalari et al 2020), similar to the clouds we found in this work. The Magellanic Bridge A clouds have similar radii and slightly narrower linewidths and luminosities than regions in the LMC and SMC with active star formation, observed at similar (subparsec) resolution.…”
Section: Co(2-1) In Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Molecular clouds with radii 0.3−1 pc, velocity FWHM 1−2 km s −1 and CO luminosities 10−100 K km s −1 pc 2 have been found in Magellanic Bridge B (Saldaño et al 2018). Magellanic Bridge C 12 CO(1−0) emission is concentrated in clouds with radii 0.9−1.5 pc and velocity FWHM 0.5−1.4 km s −1 (Kalari et al 2020), similar to the clouds we found in this work. The Magellanic Bridge A clouds have similar radii and slightly narrower linewidths and luminosities than regions in the LMC and SMC with active star formation, observed at similar (subparsec) resolution.…”
Section: Co(2-1) In Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…From this value, Y DG 3.5 Y DG,M W would be expected in an environment like the Z = 0.2 Z SMC with f DG ∼ 0.8 (Jameson et al 2018). This corresponds very well to the observed ratio between the usual Galactic X CO,M W and X CO derived in SMC clumps: for sub-pc clumps in the SMC Wing Muraoka et al (2017) derived X CO ∼ 4 X CO,MW , and for pc-scale clumps in the Magellanic Bridge Kalari et al (2020) derived X CO ∼3 X CO,MW and Valdivia-Mena et al ( 2020) found X CO ∼1.5-3.5 X CO,MW . This suggests that Y DG (and f DG ) could be used as a check of measured X CO in clumps, or vice versa.…”
Section: Relationship Between Fdg and The Co-to-h2 Conversion Factorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Lower-resolution observations run the risk of small clumps being diluted by large beam sizes, artificially inflating α vir and X CO and also increasing the likelihood of such clumps not being identified at all. Resolved observations of individual pc-scale clumps in distant low-Z environments have only recently become possible and typically yield smaller conversion factors (Muraoka et al 2017;Schruba et al 2017;Saldaño et al 2018;Kalari et al 2020;Valdivia-Mena et al 2020), approaching X CO,M W and in alignment with our expectations for clump f DG .…”
Section: Relationship Between Fdg and The Co-to-h2 Conversion Factorsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assessing the gravitational stability of clouds as measured by the virial parameter α vir (Bertoldi & McKee 1992) or if clouds conform to "Larson's relationships" between cloud radius, velocity dispersion, and surface density (Larson 1981) is ubiquitous in both theoretical and observational studies. In low-Z environments, departures from the typical values and relationships between these quantities for CO clouds under Galactic conditions have been observed (e.g., Bolatto et al 2008;Hughes et al 2013;Rubele et al 2015;Ochsendorf et al 2017;Kalari et al 2020). CO-dark gas could plausibly be responsible for these variations, since f DG is known to be high in these regions, and cloud properties inferred from CO-traced material are not guaranteed to be representative of the overall state of the structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%