2009
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2009040444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolved

Abstract: Some time has passed since the torrent of discussion surrounding the cardiovascular risk of pushing up hemoglobin concentrations in dialysis patients with erythropoietin. The debate here reflects a look back on the tension produced by confusing data and outcomes. Is it the target hemoglobin per se or the high doses of erythropoietin in subsets of resistant patients that is the problem? You decide.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are now several analyses that suggest an effect of ESA dosage on adverse clinical outcome in the treatment of CKD anemia (17)(18)(19). This issue is reviewed more extensively elsewhere (20).…”
Section: T He Trial To Reduce Cardiovascular Endpoints Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are now several analyses that suggest an effect of ESA dosage on adverse clinical outcome in the treatment of CKD anemia (17)(18)(19). This issue is reviewed more extensively elsewhere (20).…”
Section: T He Trial To Reduce Cardiovascular Endpoints Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent randomized trials of complete anemia correction using erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) raised major concerns about safety [7,8] . Whether the higher risk is secondary to detrimental CV effect of higher hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations or to dose-dependent non-erythropoietic effects of ESAs remains a matter of debate [9][10][11][12] . In particular, the latter hypothesis is substantiated by several studies evidencing the presence of receptors for ESAs in a variety of tissues outside the hematopoietic system, including vascular smooth muscle and endothelium, whose activation may lead to cell proliferation, increased release of vasoconstrictive substances and gene expression of prothrombotic factors [13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Confounding by indication and dosage-targeting bias have been raised as limitations in these analyses. 21,22 Furthermore, not all studies implicate ESA exposure in explaining risk; a recent study using marginal structural modeling failed to report an association between high ESA dosage and adverse outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%