2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06138-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolved imaging confirms a radiation belt around an ultracool dwarf

Abstract: Radiation belts are present in all large-scale Solar System planetary magnetospheres: Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune1. These persistent equatorial zones of relativistic particles up to tens of megaelectron volts in energy can extend further than ten times the planet’s radius, emit gradually varying radio emissions2–4 and affect the surface chemistry of close-in moons5. Recent observations demonstrate that very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, collectively known as ultracool dwarfs, can produce plan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an upper cutoff at ≈3 GHz, and a polar magnetic field strength of ≈4.7 kG (Shultz et al 2019b, corresponding electron gyrofrequency is 13 GHz), HD 142990 reinforces the idea that premature upper cutoff frequency is a general characteristic of ECME produced by hot magnetic stars. In the future, it will be extremely important to investigate if the same is true for other objects with large-scale, ordered magnetic fields (e.g., UCDs), since, ECME upper cutoffs are often used as a measure of maximum surface magnetic field strengths in these cooler objects (e.g., Kao et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an upper cutoff at ≈3 GHz, and a polar magnetic field strength of ≈4.7 kG (Shultz et al 2019b, corresponding electron gyrofrequency is 13 GHz), HD 142990 reinforces the idea that premature upper cutoff frequency is a general characteristic of ECME produced by hot magnetic stars. In the future, it will be extremely important to investigate if the same is true for other objects with large-scale, ordered magnetic fields (e.g., UCDs), since, ECME upper cutoffs are often used as a measure of maximum surface magnetic field strengths in these cooler objects (e.g., Kao et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objects with known radio emission that are more similar to the components of the JuMBOs are the ultracool dwarfs (Kao & Sebastian Pineda 2022). The radio emission from the latter objects has two main components: a periodically bursting emission arising in aurorae and a slowly varying, quiescent emission with a low degree of circular polarization arising from a structure similar in morphology to the Jovian radiation belts (Climent et al 2023;Kao et al 2023). The bursting component is circularly polarized and it is believed to be produced by the electron cyclotron maser instability (Hallinan et al 2006), the same coherent emission process that creates the auroral radio emission from the planets of the solar system (Pineda et al…”
Section: Nature Of the Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the quiescent component is usually interpreted as being caused by radio emission from relativistic electrons giving rise to gyrosynchrotron or synchrotron mechanisms, according to how relativistic the electrons are. Now it is known that this quiescent emission is produced in radiation belts (Climent et al 2023;Kao et al 2023). Given that the radio emission from JuMBO 24 is steady in time, one would expect it to be produced by relativistic electrons spiraling in the magnetic fields of a radiation belt.…”
Section: Nature Of the Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( M denotes M‐shell, the jovicentric radial distance of a field line at the magnetic equator normalized to 1 R J , based on the JRM09 internal magnetic field model combined with the current sheet model Con2020 (R. J. Wilson et al., 2023). ) Trapped at M < 5, such harsh electron radiation is the one in all within our reach strengthful enough for synchrotron emissions (Bolton et al., 2002) as the astrophysical sources (e.g., Kao et al., 2023). However, at ∼10 < M < 20 the magnetospheric configuration is ambiguous as it gradually transitions from a dipole‐ to sheet‐like structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Wilson et al, 2023).) Trapped at M < 5, such harsh electron radiation is the one in all within our reach strengthful enough for synchrotron emissions (Bolton et al, 2002) as the astrophysical sources (e.g., Kao et al, 2023). However, at ∼10 < M < 20 the magnetospheric configuration is ambiguous as it gradually transitions from a dipole-to sheetlike structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%