The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-218x(00)00198-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolvability in graphs and the metric dimension of a graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
850
0
22

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 814 publications
(938 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
850
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that if W is a resolving set of a connected graph G and W ⊆ W , then W is also a resolving set of G. It was shown in [2] that the path of order n ≥ 2 is the only connected graph of order n with dimension 1. Thus for a connected graph G that is not a path, if W is a Steiner basis of G and T is a Steiner W -tree, then V (T ) is a connected resolving set for G. These observations yield an upper bound for the connected resolving number of a nontrivial connected graph that is not a path in terms of the Steiner distances of its bases.…”
Section: An Upper Bound For the Connected Resolving Number Of A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observe that if W is a resolving set of a connected graph G and W ⊆ W , then W is also a resolving set of G. It was shown in [2] that the path of order n ≥ 2 is the only connected graph of order n with dimension 1. Thus for a connected graph G that is not a path, if W is a Steiner basis of G and T is a Steiner W -tree, then V (T ) is a connected resolving set for G. These observations yield an upper bound for the connected resolving number of a nontrivial connected graph that is not a path in terms of the Steiner distances of its bases.…”
Section: An Upper Bound For the Connected Resolving Number Of A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we show that for every integer k ≥ 2, there exists a graph with a unique cr-set of cardinality k. For positive integers d and n with d < n, define f (n, d) as the least positive integer k such that k + d k ≥ n. It was shown [2] that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 2 and diameter d, then dim(G) ≥ f (n, d). Since cr(G) ≥ dim(G) for every graph G, we have the following.…”
Section: Graphs With a Unique Cr-set Or Various Cr-setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first question was independently answered by Yushmanov [33], Khuller et al [17], and Chartrand et al [5], who proved that the minimum order of a graph in G β,D is β + D (see Lemma 2.2). Thus it is natural to consider the following problem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, only a weak upper bound was known. In particular, Khuller et al [17] and Chartrand et al [5] independently proved that every graph in G β,D has at most D β + β vertices. This bound is tight only for D ≤ 3 or β = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%