Zero-Dimensional Schemes 1994
DOI: 10.1515/9783110889260-016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolutions of O-dimensional subschemes of a smooth quadric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Q 4 1 (P 1 )| = 1, |π −1 1 (P 2 )| = 4, |π −1 1 (P 3 )| = 1, |π −1 1 (P 4 )| = 2, |π −1 1 (P 5 )| = 2, and |π −1 1 (P 6 )| = 3. The conjugate of α X is α * X = (6, 4, 2, 1), and hence, by Corollary 5.13 we know that B C = (6,10,12,13). Similarly, β X = (4, 3, 3, 3), and thus β * X = (4, 4, 4, 1).…”
Section: Classifying the Borders Of Hilbert Functions Of Points Inmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Q 4 1 (P 1 )| = 1, |π −1 1 (P 2 )| = 4, |π −1 1 (P 3 )| = 1, |π −1 1 (P 4 )| = 2, |π −1 1 (P 5 )| = 2, and |π −1 1 (P 6 )| = 3. The conjugate of α X is α * X = (6, 4, 2, 1), and hence, by Corollary 5.13 we know that B C = (6,10,12,13). Similarly, β X = (4, 3, 3, 3), and thus β * X = (4, 4, 4, 1).…”
Section: Classifying the Borders Of Hilbert Functions Of Points Inmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this situation there are several classifications. Giuffrida, Maggioni, and Ragusa [7], who helped to initiate the study of points in multiprojective spaces (see, for example [8,9,12,13,14,18,20,21,22] for more on these points), provided the first classification. They showed that ACM sets of points in P 1 × P 1 can be classified via their Hilbert functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When k = 1, v(s; n) equals the expected value for ν(I X ) as predicted by the ideal generation conjecture. Furthermore, using [9,10], we show that ν(I X ) = v(s; 1, 1) for a sufficiently general set of s points in P 1 × P 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although such sets have been studied (cf. [9,10]) we could find no proof in the literature for the existence of such sets when k 2 (the case k = 1 is [5, Theorem 4]). We therefore begin by providing a proof of this 'folklore' result.…”
Section: Points In Generic Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation