1989
DOI: 10.1117/12.953211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution Properties Of A Computed Radiographic System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,29 Previous investigators have slightly angulated their slit test devices with respect to the pixel array in order to deduce the non-aliased, socalled presampled, 8 response from various phase shifts of the slit opening with respect to the image array. 10,12,14,[30][31][32][33] In order to determine the perpendicular distance from each pixel to the test device, the exact angle and position of the test device must be known. In many previous studies, either the angulation of the test device has been ignored or the method used to determine this angle has not been fully disclosed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,29 Previous investigators have slightly angulated their slit test devices with respect to the pixel array in order to deduce the non-aliased, socalled presampled, 8 response from various phase shifts of the slit opening with respect to the image array. 10,12,14,[30][31][32][33] In order to determine the perpendicular distance from each pixel to the test device, the exact angle and position of the test device must be known. In many previous studies, either the angulation of the test device has been ignored or the method used to determine this angle has not been fully disclosed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the CR systems of different makes and models have been characterized in terms of their image quality characteristics by previous studies. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, as the methodologies for such characterizations have not been standardized, the results of these studies cannot be directly compared. Ideally, such comparisons should be undertaken using identical methodologies, an objective that has not been widely pursued in prior investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of improvements in DSP screens and instrumentation for reading screens have been introduced since earlier reports of DSP image quality were published. [1][2][3][4][5] We report in this paper the measured image quality of a DSP instrument with features for scanning 35 by 43 cm phosphor screens with 100 m pixels ͑3520ϫ4280 array size͒ rather than with standard 200 m pixels ͑1760ϫ2140 array size͒. This work was largely motivated by a desire to understand the relative performance of 2k and 4k DSP systems for chest radiography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%