2002
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution of refractory no‐reflow with intracoronary epinephrine

Abstract: Refractory no-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Charts were reviewed to identify 29 consecutive patients in whom intracoronary epinephrine was administered for refractory no-reflow. The effects of intracoronary epinephrine on coronary flow (TIMI grade), cardiac rhythm, and systolic blood pressure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory were assessed. Administration of intracoronary epinephrine (mean dose, 139 +/- 189 microg) resulted in sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…676,678,679,681,684,686,689,691 There are fewer data to support the use of epinephrine. 692 No-reflow after rotational atherectomy was less common with nicorandil compared with verapamil infusions in 3 studies, [693][694][695] and an infusion of nicorandil/adenosine during rotational atherectomy prevented no-reflow in 98% of patients. 677 Trials of pre-PCI intracoronary verapamil, nicardipine, and adenosine have reported them to be safe but have not demonstrated reductions in post-PCI no-reflow.…”
Section: Fondaparinux: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…676,678,679,681,684,686,689,691 There are fewer data to support the use of epinephrine. 692 No-reflow after rotational atherectomy was less common with nicorandil compared with verapamil infusions in 3 studies, [693][694][695] and an infusion of nicorandil/adenosine during rotational atherectomy prevented no-reflow in 98% of patients. 677 Trials of pre-PCI intracoronary verapamil, nicardipine, and adenosine have reported them to be safe but have not demonstrated reductions in post-PCI no-reflow.…”
Section: Fondaparinux: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14, 15 Rossen et al 14 reported that the administration of a 125-or 250-g/kg bolus of intravenous diltiazem followed by a 5-g/kg per minute infusion in 8 patients reduced heart rate (77Ϯ18 to 72Ϯ17 bpm, PϽ0.005) and mean arterial pressure (96Ϯ11 to 86Ϯ15 mm Hg, PϽ0.005) while decreasing coronary flow reserve from 3.9Ϯ1.2 to 3.6Ϯ1.1 (PϽ0.01). 5 In 10 patients treated with IC diltiazem, in dosages of 150 to 600 g given as bolus infusions, mean arterial pressure was unchanged. The heart rate was maintained constant by atrial pacing.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Pharmacological Hyperemic Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the systemic administration of intravenous pharmacotherapies, highly localized administration of intracoronary pharmacotherapy may be associated with a several-hundred-fold increase in the local concentration of an agent in the epicardial artery and microcirculation. A number of pharmacotherapies, including adenosine, 5,6 calcium channel blockers, 7 ␣-blockers, 8 ␤ 2 -receptor activators, 9 other vasodilators, antithrombotics, 10,11 and antiplatelet agents, [12][13][14] have been used to treat microvascular dysfunction.…”
Section: Article P 49mentioning
confidence: 99%