“…However, this statement of Sainz et al should be softened. The "55 bpm rule" is widely known [1,5]; however, whether < 55 bpm jeopardizes fetal wellbeing has yet to be determined [6]. Furthermore, in Sainz et al's case, close relatives of the baby's father had long QT syndrome, and, thus, this fetus may also have had a long QTc interval.…”