2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2079695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution of Financial Distress Under Chapter 11

Abstract: We would like to thank Jan Ericsson, Jean Helwege and Franck Moraux for their useful comments. We also thank Ali Boudhina for excellent research assistance. Annabi and Breton acknowledge financial support from IFM 2 and NSERC. François acknowledges financial support from SSHRC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stackelberg/Nash equilibrium solution at a given negotiation round is obtained as in Annabi et al (2010), where  identifies the leader at this round. Thus, when the leader proposes his reorganization plan, he takes into account the equilibrium reactions of the two followers, where neither player has a unilateral incentive to change his strategy.…”
Section: Continuation Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Stackelberg/Nash equilibrium solution at a given negotiation round is obtained as in Annabi et al (2010), where  identifies the leader at this round. Thus, when the leader proposes his reorganization plan, he takes into account the equilibrium reactions of the two followers, where neither player has a unilateral incentive to change his strategy.…”
Section: Continuation Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a firm whose assets grow at expected rate  = 15% with a standard deviation of  = 35%. These asset parameters are similar to those in Annabi et al (2010). The firm is financed with a total coupon of 10.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These papers incorporate important aspects of the Chapter 11 code, e.g., the automatic stay, but a successful exit of Chapter 11 does not solve the underlying capital structure (financial distress) problem. Annabi et al (2010) consider the outcome of Chapter 11 as a non-cooperative game. They focus on the judge's role, and the random intervention leads to a game in multiple rounds, but they do not consider the firm's optimal capital structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent claims models are a well accepted approach to explore agent behaviour under various scenarios. Such models have been used to analyze creditor-equityholder bargaining (Anderson and Sundaresan, 1996;Annabi, Breton, and Francois, 2010), entrepreneurial decision making (Mcgrath, 1999;O'Brien, Folta, and Johnson, 2003), and optimal project abandonment (Myers and Majd, 1990), among other applications.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%