2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00021-008-0290-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution of d’Alembert’s Paradox

Abstract: We propose a resolution of d'Alembert's Paradox comparing observation of substantial drag/lift in fluids with very small viscosity such as air and water, with the mathematical prediction of zero drag/lift of stationary irrotational solutions of the incompressible inviscid Euler equations, referred to as potential flow. We present analytical and computational evidence that (i) potential flow cannot be observed because it is illposed or unstable to perturbations, (ii) computed viscosity solutions of the Euler eq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented results support the theory of lift force generation by Hoffman and Johnson published in [1,2], however they could not be considered as the final and decisive confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented results support the theory of lift force generation by Hoffman and Johnson published in [1,2], however they could not be considered as the final and decisive confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The motivation of the presented study is supporting new ideas about principle of flight by Hoffman and Johnson from KTH Stockholm, see [1,2]. The new hypothesis of physical mechanism of flight relies on existence of streamwise vortical structures on the suction side of the airfoil and within its wake.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More generally, we present evidence that all (non-trivial) initially smooth Euler solutions exhibit blowup into turbulent solutions. This work closely connects to the new resolution of d'Alembert's paradox presented in [15].…”
Section: The Clay Navier-stokes Millennium Problemsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We have presented evidence in the form of analysis and computational studies, that the macroscopic features of high Reynolds number flow, including 3D flow separation, is mainly determined by large scale stability aspects, rather than boundary layer effects [19,[1][2][3]5]. …”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter-free aspect (iii) of DFS is related to the fact that no subgrid scale stresses or Reynolds stresses are parametrized as in LES (Large Eddy Simulation) or RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations) [16], and that for high Reynolds numbers we assume that the skin friction of the boundary layers is dominated by inertial effects, so that a free slip boundary condition is used at solid boundaries [17][18][19]. In contrast to RANS and LES, no averaging or filtering operators are introduced in DFS, the resolution of the turbulent scales is determined as part of the computation, with the local mesh size adapted based on the required precision in the chosen quantity of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%