2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistivity measurements of carbon–polymer composites in chemical sensors: impact of carbon concentration and geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensors and other materials (polyisobutylene, carbon black and trichloroethylene) were the same as those described in our previous work [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sensors and other materials (polyisobutylene, carbon black and trichloroethylene) were the same as those described in our previous work [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this is a fairly good model with which to simulate the current flow in the sensor. The details of this resistivity model have been published [16].…”
Section: Conductivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Where formulation studies have been carried out, these focused on the influence of the carbon/graphite relative proportions, 12 the carbon/graphite physical and electrical characteristics, 13,14 and the proportion of conductive material required for charge percolation through the cured film. 15 A variety of binder systems are compatible with carbon/graphite materials, such as epoxy resins, alkyd resins, acrylic resins, polyurethane resins, or phenolic resins, and the choice is generally governed by the curing temperature, substrate which is being printed, film flexibility, and the resin compatibility with the final application. The choice of binder/binders is usually proprietary information held by manufacturers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%