2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistivity characterization of the Krafla and Hengill geothermal fields through 3D MT inverse modeling

Abstract: Krafla and Hengill volcanic complexes, located 300 km apart, are both known as hightemperature geothermal systems located within neo-volcanic zones of Iceland. This paper demonstrates the utilization of three-dimensional (3D) magnetotelluric (MT) inversions from three different inverse modeling algorithms, which leads to characterizing the electrical resistivity structure of geothermal reservoirs with a much greater level of confidence in accuracy and resolution than if a single algorithm was employed in the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This temperature estimation supports our interpretation, because the smectite-rich zone or the transition zone from smectite to illite/chlorite generally occurs in the 100-250 °C temperature range and possesses both a low resistivity and a low permeability (e.g. Ussher et al 2000;Gasperikova et al 2015). Comparison of this resistivity structure with the distribution of earthquake swarms in the region (Yukutake et al 2017) highlights the good agreement between the upper limit of seismicity beneath the central cones and the bottom of the low-resistivity bell-shaped conductor (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This temperature estimation supports our interpretation, because the smectite-rich zone or the transition zone from smectite to illite/chlorite generally occurs in the 100-250 °C temperature range and possesses both a low resistivity and a low permeability (e.g. Ussher et al 2000;Gasperikova et al 2015). Comparison of this resistivity structure with the distribution of earthquake swarms in the region (Yukutake et al 2017) highlights the good agreement between the upper limit of seismicity beneath the central cones and the bottom of the low-resistivity bell-shaped conductor (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Since resistivity is sensitive to temperature (including thermal alteration) and the presence of fluids, it is commonly applied to infer the structural setting in volcanic and geothermal environments (e.g. Nurhasan et al 2006;Kanda et al 2008;Komori et al 2013;Yamaya et al 2013;Gasperikova et al 2015;Seki et al 2015Seki et al , 2016Usui et al 2017). In our study area, we obtained magnetotelluric (MT) data in the dense site array (Ogawa et al 2011;Yoshimura et al 2012Yoshimura et al , 2013 to infer the structure of Hakone volcano, with a focus on shallow caldera Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, electrical and electromagnetic (EM) methods have been developed as high-temperature geothermal reservoir prospecting tools (e.g., [87][88][89][90][91][92]). These EM data, along with borehole data [90], served to create a general model of geothermal reservoirs by correlating temperature and resistivity measurements with hydrothermal alteration.…”
Section: Implications For Geothermal Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, electrical and electromagnetic (EM) methods have been developed as high-temperature geothermal reservoir prospecting tools (e.g., [87][88][89][90][91][92]). These EM data, along with borehole data [90], served to create a general model of geothermal reservoirs by correlating temperature and resistivity measurements with hydrothermal alteration. Most high-temperature geothermal reservoirs within basaltic rocks, as is the case for the Icelandic context, present a similar 3D resistivity distribution, with the occurrences of a low resistivity anomaly at shallow depths (for temperatures ranging from 110 to 200 • C) underlain by a more resistive core (dominated by chlorite and epidote minerals and for which temperatures exceed 250 • C).…”
Section: Implications For Geothermal Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively small-scale 3D geothermal models, on the order of ≤100 km in diameters, are described in the literature with non-exhaustive examples from around the world including Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Italy, New Zealand, The Netherlands, the United States of America and Taiwan (e.g. Guglielmetti et al, 2013;;Chang et al, 2014;Gasperikova et al, 2015;Ratouis et al, 2016;Siler et al, 2016;Przybycin et al, 2017;Békési et al, 2020;Fuchs, 2020). On the other hand, regional or large-scale 3D models, on the order of >100 km diameters, are just starting to be used for the assessment of geothermal resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%