Resistivity and induced polarization monitoring of salt transport under natural hydraulic gradients

Abstract

We demonstrate the use of resistivity/induced polarization (IP) monitoring of salt transport under natural hydraulic loads. Electrical monitoring of saline tracer transport during forced injection has been demonstrated previously. Detection of tracer transport under natural hydraulic loading is difficult because neither the hydraulic load nor the tracer resistivity can be controlled. In one study, we identify the electrical response to salt transport in a dynamic beach environment. Resistivity/IP imaging resolved the structure of the saltwater‐freshwater interface and evidence for tide‐induced groundwater transport. Resistivity increases in the near surface and at depth, upbeach of the high‐tide mark, accompanied by tidal transgression. We attribute this to desaturation and decreasing salinity in the near surface and to decreasing salinity at depth, despite tidal transgression. Monitoring of groundwater levels indicates a phase lag between the tide level and groundwater level, supporting the electrical data. IP was insensitive to groundwater salinity variation. In a second study, we identify the electrical response to recharge‐induced salt transport from a road‐salt storage facility. Conductivity and IP models for monitoring lines, located on the basis of an EM31 survey, resolved the subsurface salt distribution. IP modeling resolved the sediment‐bedrock interface. Modeling of monthly conductivity differences revealed conductivity increases and decreases at the locations of salt contamination, which correlate with the recharge pattern. We attribute near‐surface conductivity increases after heavy rainfall to increasing saturation and ion dissolution. Corresponding conductivity decreases at depth are attributed to flushing of the bedrock with freshwater. Essentially, the opposite response was observed during a quiet monitoring period following heavy recharge. Near‐surface IP changes are consistent with this interpretation. Salt transport occurring under natural hydraulic conditions was monitored with resistivity imaging. IP improved characterization of the hydrogeologic framework but was of limited value in monitoring salt transport in these environments.

Time-lapse resistivity investigations for imaging saltwater transport in glaciofluvial deposits

“…mapping saline water intrusions (Barker 1990;Giao 2003, among many others), imaging tidal cycles (e.g. Acworth and Dasey 2001;Slater and Sandberg 2000), delineating contaminated plumes with increased chloride concentration originating from landfills (e.g. Rosqvist et al 2003;Ogilvy et al 2002) and for hydrogeological experiments (e.g.…”

High-resolution Electrical Resistivity Tomography monitoring of a tracer test in a confined aquifer

“…As resistivity depends on properties such as saturation, solute concentration and temperature, timelapse ERT can be used to monitor natural and anthropogenic processes that cause changes in these properties, such as infiltration (Daily et al, 1992;Looms et al, 2008), saline intrusion (Slater and Sandberg, 2000;Ogilvy et al, 2007;, leachate recirculation (Guerin et al, 2004), and contaminated land remediation (Daily and Ramirez, 1995;LaBrecque et al, 1996;Slater and Binley, 2003;Halihan et al, 2005.…”

Statistical Analysis of Resistivity Anomalies Caused by Underground Caves

“…A noise during measurements is known to be caused due to poor galvanic contacts, device inherent noise and external anthropogenic factors (FLORES-OROZ- CO et al 2012; and references therein). The noise assessment is usually carried out via repeatability examination (SLATER and SANDBERG 2000) or reciprocity testing (HERMANS et al 2012;KOESTEL et al, 2008;. The reciprocal error testing is frequently preferable (SLATER and SANDBERG 2000; SLATER Figure 4 The examples of fitting for the entire inverted resistivity data set (including Nari and chalk layers) to a log-normal distribution.…”