2018
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201803135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistivity Ahead of the Bit – from Vision to Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] [2] [3]). Deep EM measurements is a technological step change that gives more information about geological structures, fluid contacts and reservoir properties deeper into the formation than traditional Logging While Drilling (LWD) measurements, even ahead of the bit [4]. The technology contributes to closing the gap between seismic scale measurements and well scale measurements.…”
Section: Current Methods For Geosteeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] [2] [3]). Deep EM measurements is a technological step change that gives more information about geological structures, fluid contacts and reservoir properties deeper into the formation than traditional Logging While Drilling (LWD) measurements, even ahead of the bit [4]. The technology contributes to closing the gap between seismic scale measurements and well scale measurements.…”
Section: Current Methods For Geosteeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking ahead of the bit has been an object of research since the 1990s and is currently ongoing [45]. The unpredictable environment in front of the bit can pose significant risks for drilling.…”
Section: Resistivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well trajectory resulting from the bottom scenario has a value of 49.81 equivalent meters of sand drilled, which is approximately 58.6% of the theoretically possible value for that scenario. Note that new developments improving the pre-drill model or the look-around/look-ahead capability (such as in Constable et al (2016)) will improve the decision outcomes provided by DSS.…”
Section: Optimal Landing In Different Geological Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%