2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.10.111003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistive-wall impedance of two-layer tube

Abstract: In contrast to electron machines, beam particles travel in most proton or heavy ion circular accelerators with nonrelativistic speed. The resistive-wall impedance of the cylindrical two-layer tube with finite thickness is studied in this paper for any material in the nonrelativistic case. The nonrelativistic correction for a special case of metallic-type layers is given afterward. Finally, we derive the general expression of the resistive-wall impedance for the multilayer tubes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In advanced electron, hadron, or heavy ion accelerators [3-9], the technical solutions for high vacuum performance, cures of resistive instabilities [10 -12], prevention of the static charge [13,14], and shielding of external radiation [15][16][17][18][19] very often imply the usage of laminated (or multilayer) vacuum chamber configuration. These complications along with the stringent requirements to the beam quality recently drove rigorous study of the longitudinal and transverse resistive impedances of the multilayer vacuum chamber to obtain the exact analytical solution valid for both nonrelativistic and ultrarelativistic beams [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In advanced electron, hadron, or heavy ion accelerators [3-9], the technical solutions for high vacuum performance, cures of resistive instabilities [10 -12], prevention of the static charge [13,14], and shielding of external radiation [15][16][17][18][19] very often imply the usage of laminated (or multilayer) vacuum chamber configuration. These complications along with the stringent requirements to the beam quality recently drove rigorous study of the longitudinal and transverse resistive impedances of the multilayer vacuum chamber to obtain the exact analytical solution valid for both nonrelativistic and ultrarelativistic beams [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transverse dipole impedance for the two-layer tube with infinite external layer thickness is derived in [26]. A number of analytical and numerical studies of multilayer tube impedance are given in [17,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32]. In [20,21] the analytical solutions for longitudinal and transverse impedances of the two-layer tube in the ultrarelativistic case have been derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these hypotheses, if we add the condition that ωb=ðγβcÞ ≃ 8 × 10 −4 ≪ 1, where we have used the maximum frequency of 100 GHz and, for the relativistic factors β and γ, the machine with lowest energy, which is equivalent to ignore space charge effects, the longitudinal and transverse impedances of a two-layer circular beam pipe [21] can be written in a simple form as…”
Section: Resistive Wall Impedance With Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To go beyond these limitations a general multi-layer theory is considered here. For an axisymmetric two dimensional geometry, analytical calculations have been existing since a long time: one can mention the general formalism of B. Zotter [18,[28][29][30][31], the one of A. Burov and V. Lebedev [32] which is simpler but slightly less general, and more recently some matrix formalisms using potentials [33][34][35][36]. For other simple but non-axisymmetric two-dimensional geometries (elliptic, rectangular, or flat and infinitely large), the usual approach is to deduce the impedance from the axisymmetric case multiplied by some constant form factors [37] depending on the geometry, often called Yokoya [7] or Laslett [6] factors.…”
Section: B Two-dimensional Models For the Computation Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%