“Resisting the Ban”

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present an evocative story “Resisting the Ban” which illustrates the ethical and pragmatic issues that nurses face when contending with smoking ban policies in inpatient psychiatric settings. Design/methodology/approach The creative story “Resisting the Ban” was developed based on an organisational auto-ethnographic approach. The story was crafted through employing creative writing techniques and through framing and critiquing memories via several theoretical frames. Findings The story illustrates how smoking ban policies have created pragmatic and ethical issues on wards. The work practices of nurses have changed as have their relationships with patients. The liberties of involuntary patients have also been infringed. Research limitations/implications This approach can illuminate links between acts of resistance and issues associated with public policies. Practical implications The effects of smoking bans need to be considered more carefully particularly in relation to their effects on workers and patients. The social meaning of the smoking bans needs closer investigation. Policy needs to be recrafted so that it better addresses the liberties of involuntary patients. Also ward nurses need to be able to carry out their roles in a manner which is consistent with their values. Social implications Public policies, such as smoking bans, can produce negative consequences maligning relationships, practices and cultures. Critical auto-ethnography provides a means of understanding issues that have resulted from problematic policies. Originality/value Scholarly work conducted on the relationship between everyday resistance in workplaces and public policies is rare. This study offers new “insider” insights into the negative effects of a smoking ban policy in psychiatric inpatient settings.

“Is it safe?” – Doing ethnography on safety cover ups

“…Several autoethnographers talk of their use of memories (e.g. Jonrad, 2018; Pelly, 2017; Sobre-Denton, 2012). Some of these memories are drawn from a considerable time ago, e.g.…”

“…Thus, alternative understandings are presented alongside official organisational ones and readers can decide what it means in their context. This approach is akin to Jonrad's (2018, p. 279) overarching approach that uses stories to activate people by “connecting local troubles to a wider political agenda” and in so doing “unmasking systems of power and the moralities that drive them”.…”