2004
DOI: 10.1157/13059054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistencias bacterianas y farmacodinámica como bases de la prescripción de antibióticos en infecciones respiratorias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a multicenter, prospective observational study in children with severe CAP due to S. pneumoniae, the use of 200,000 IU/kg/day of aqueous penicillin G in 4 daily doses was proposed and good effectiveness of this posologic regimen was demonstrated (19). The rationale for the use of 200,000 IU/kg/day of aqueous penicillin G was to overcome penicillin resistance in pneumococcal CAP by increasing the dose and, therefore, increasing the duration of the serum concentration of penicillin above the MIC (10,20). The administration in 4 daily doses was based on a more comfortable posologic regimen, with lower administration costs, better use of a Numerators indicate the number of children with the finding and denominators indicate the total number of children examined for the finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multicenter, prospective observational study in children with severe CAP due to S. pneumoniae, the use of 200,000 IU/kg/day of aqueous penicillin G in 4 daily doses was proposed and good effectiveness of this posologic regimen was demonstrated (19). The rationale for the use of 200,000 IU/kg/day of aqueous penicillin G was to overcome penicillin resistance in pneumococcal CAP by increasing the dose and, therefore, increasing the duration of the serum concentration of penicillin above the MIC (10,20). The administration in 4 daily doses was based on a more comfortable posologic regimen, with lower administration costs, better use of a Numerators indicate the number of children with the finding and denominators indicate the total number of children examined for the finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien la concentración sérica de levofloxacino (C max ) es superior a la de moxifloxacino, para obtener un valor del área bajo la curva similar a la de éste, levofloxacino debería administrarse a dosis de 500 mg/12 h [14,60]. El tiempo de exposición durante las 24 h del día o área bajo la curva inhibitoria conseguida (ABC 24 /CMI), es trascendental para estimar la eficacia clínica, ya que, cuanto mayor sea ésta (para S. pneumoniae debe ser siempre ≥ 30 mg/h/l), aumentará el éxito clínico y disminuirá la posibilidad de desarrollo de mutantes y aparición de resistencias, hecho crucial que ocurre con moxifloxacino vía oral (según las CMIs su ABC 24 /CMI se sitúa entre 96-384 mg/h/l), mientras que para levofloxacino o azitromicina (por vía oral) son de 35 y 3 mg/h/l, respectivamente [14,60-62]. …”
Section: Tratamientounclassified
“…Dentro de este grupo y frente a S. pneumoniae, cefditoreno es varias veces más activo que amoxicilina-clavulánico, aunque en la práctica los parámetros FC-FD (farmacocinética/farmacodinámica) de ambos son superponibles con dosis de 400 mg/12 h de cefditoreno y dosis de 2.000/125 mg/12 h de la formulación retardada de amoxicilina-clavulánico durante 10 días para una NAC. Así según sus CMIs, la actividad in vitro previsible de cefditoreno es de 94% con dosis de 200 mg/12 h y de 99,8% a dosis de 400 mg/12 h, lo que le convierte con esta última pauta en la mejor opción entre las cefalosporinas vía oral [14,60,62,63]. …”
Section: Tratamientounclassified