1988
DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(88)90139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistant starch: Its chemical form in foodstuffs and effect on digestibility in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
113
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
113
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, larger starch granules are characterized by a smaller surface area to volume ratio, and hence a lower surface potentially subjected to hydrolysis by enzymes (Tester et al, 2006). In this work, the starch amount of native starches categorized as RS broadly reflects increasing granule size, being wheat , maize , pea , potato, which concurs with the results reported by Ring et al (1988). The different RS content of native starches can be also related to the relative amount of crystalline material within starch granule and to the type of arrangement of the crystal structure (Blasek and Gilbert, 2010;Regmi et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, larger starch granules are characterized by a smaller surface area to volume ratio, and hence a lower surface potentially subjected to hydrolysis by enzymes (Tester et al, 2006). In this work, the starch amount of native starches categorized as RS broadly reflects increasing granule size, being wheat , maize , pea , potato, which concurs with the results reported by Ring et al (1988). The different RS content of native starches can be also related to the relative amount of crystalline material within starch granule and to the type of arrangement of the crystal structure (Blasek and Gilbert, 2010;Regmi et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The starch retrogradation can also accompany with increase of enzyme hydrolysis (Ring et al, 1988). Amylose-lipid complexes can decrease starch retrogradation and restrain the intra-action among amylose particles (Zobel, 1973).…”
Section: Bread Weight Volume and Specific Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility of starch to enzyme attack is influenced by several factors, such as granule size and available specific surface (Franco et al, 1992(Franco et al, , 1998Knutsonetal., 1982;Tahir etal., 2010;Tangetal.,2004),surfaceporosityandchannels (FaIllionetal., 1992(FaIllionetal., , 1993SujkaandJamroz, 2007;Zhang et al, 2006;), amylose and amylopectin content (Blazeck and COpelaIld, 2010;Hoover and Manuel, 1995;Hoover and Sosulski, 1985;Holm aIld Bjorck, 1988;Ring et al, 1988),crystallinestructure(Chungetal.,2010Zhouetal.,2004;Gunaratneand Hoover, 2002), extent of branching (long a.I11ylopectin branchesibraIlch density) (Dona eta1.,2010;Shresthaet al, 2010), distribution pattem ofa-(l,6) branch points between the amorphous aIld crystalline regions (Gunaratne and Hoover, 2002;Janeetal., 1997), degree of crystallinity (Chungetal., Zhou et al, 2004), packing of polymers within granules (dense/loose), helical conformation ofa.I11ylose molecules (Shrestha et al, 2010), presence of non-starch substances (proteins, lipids and phosphorus) (HooveraIld Manuel, 1995;Perera and Hoover, 1998) and inhibitors (Colonna et al, 1992;Zhou et al, 2004). The kinetics of a-amylolysis of granular and gelatinized starch are characterized by an initial rapid hydrolysis phase followed by a slower phase.…”
Section: Enzymebydrolysisofnativestarcbesmentioning
confidence: 99%