2015
DOI: 10.1177/1367549415603376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance through realism: Youth subculture films in 1970s (and 1980s) Britain

Abstract: Film scholars have argued that the British social realist films of the late 1950s and early 1960s reflect the concerns articulated by British cultural studies during the same period. This article looks at how the social realist films of the 1970s and early 1980s similarly reflect the concerns of British cultural studies scholarship produced by the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies during the 1970s. It argues that the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies’ approach to stylis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, while exploring the meaning of style is important for understanding cultural practices, a problem with Hebdige’s work can be found in the absence of the lived experience of punks and their own interpretations of the meanings of their style. The CCCS approach, which treats subcultures as static, class-based formations, has been widely criticised as overly rigid (Weiner, 2015), but it is open to criticism also for its empirical flaws arising on account of dependence on second-hand research (Cohen, 1980; Muggleton, 2000).…”
Section: From Cccs Beginnings To Post-subcultural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, while exploring the meaning of style is important for understanding cultural practices, a problem with Hebdige’s work can be found in the absence of the lived experience of punks and their own interpretations of the meanings of their style. The CCCS approach, which treats subcultures as static, class-based formations, has been widely criticised as overly rigid (Weiner, 2015), but it is open to criticism also for its empirical flaws arising on account of dependence on second-hand research (Cohen, 1980; Muggleton, 2000).…”
Section: From Cccs Beginnings To Post-subcultural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%