Resistance of winter wheat cultivars to common bunt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Wint. and T. laevis Kühn

Dumalasová, V.; Bartoš, Pavel

doi:10.1007/bf03356173

Cited by 26 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The same prediction for T. controversa showed a narrower variation from 0 to 65% in 2007, while any infection was observed in 2008. Several investigators detailed similar results in their studies (Dumalasova & Bartos;2006& 2007a& 2010. This variation may be due to a different pathological pattern in the inoculation used or environmental conditions (Dumalasova & Bartos, 2010;Miczyński 1953).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Karimi¹,

Amini²,

Moradi³

et al. 2012

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common and dwarf bunts are the most important diseases of wheat in the Kurdistan province, west of Iran. In this study, to investigate the reaction of wheat genotypes (grouped into two cold and warm season genotypes), they were evaluated for infection to common and dwarf bunts during 2007 and 2008 cropping seasons. Plant materials were groups of wheat genotypes included 82 and 158 genotypes from the cold and warm areas which were assessed in this study. For present study, wheat seeds were inoculated by common and dwarf bunts teliospores before planting, and sowing was accomplished during fall season of 2007 and 2008 at Ghamlou and Saral experimental stations. At maturity time, the percentage of infected heads and the main reactions were determined. Results revealed that resistance of genotypes to dwarf bunt was higher than common bunt and also bunt incidence of durum genotypes was relatively lower than bread wheat genotypes. The results demonstrated the existence of resistance gene analogues in durum wheat genotypes which could be used as donor progenitors. Replacement of durum wheat cultivars instead of bread wheat varieties could be an effective way in the developing of substantial farming.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Karimi¹,

Amini²,

Moradi³

et al. 2012

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In managing seed-borne diseases, resistant varieties play a crucial role, and therefore efforts have been made to identify sources of disease resistance against, e.g. common bunt (Dumalasová and Bartoš 2006;Gaudet et al 2007;Matanguihan et al 2011) and black point (Conner and Davidson 1988;Christopher et al 2007) in wheat. Wheat material originating from CIMMYT has been evaluated in Canada and limited resistance was found (Gaudet et al 1995).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to these mentioned varieties and lines, the variety "Norman" bread by the TFI was used as susceptible check in the experiments evaluating reaction of genotypes to common bunt in the field in Turkey and in the greenhouse in Sweden. The Swedish variety "Stava", known to be resistant to common bunt (Borgen and Davanlou 2001;Dumalasová and Bartoš 2006), was included in the greenhouse experiment as a resistant control. Advanced breeding lines included in this study were all originally received from the International Agricultural Research Centres (IARC), including CIMMYT (The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Mexico) and IWWIP (International Winter Wheat Improvement Program, Turkey) ( Table 1).…”

Section: Plant Materials and Their Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and managing wheat seed-borne diseases: Options and suggestions from the case of Tajikistan

Husenov

Asaad

Mumınjanov³

et al. 2017

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wheat seed-borne diseases are among the major constraints reducing crop yield and the quality of seed and grain. In this study we aimed to evaluate the type and prevalence of fungal seed-borne diseases in Tajik wheat seed samples. Particular emphasis was given to common bunt resistance in advanced wheat breeding materials. Furthermore, we aimed to identify options for improving the seed quality. Seed samples collected from two different locations in Tajikistan were tested by conventional seed-health testing methods for presence of seed-borne diseases. Nineteen advanced wheat breeding lines and three varieties collected from the Tajik wheat breeding program were screened using an artificial inoculation test for their response to common bunt. Significant differences were found between the locations and genotypes concerning presence of common bunt and black point. Fourteen fungal species, where most of them are pathogenic for wheat, were identified in the seed samples. Tilletia laevis, T. tritici, Bipolaris sorokiniana, Stemphylium spp., and Drechslera spp. were the major pathogenic fungi observed in collected wheat samples. Common bunt was predominantly represented by T. laevis. No strong resistance was found in the studied Tajik wheat material, although a low percentage of infection was found in one line (SHARK/ F4105W2.1), while the material was evaluated for common bunt resistance. In managing seed-borne diseases, breeding of resistant varieties should be given a priority, while cultural practices such as preventing contamination and monitoring seed health status should also be considered, as a last resort the use of chemical seed treatments are advised.

show abstract

“…Since 1988 common bunt resistance in wheat has been studied by means of seed inoculation with a mixture of Tilletia tritici and Tilletia laevis teliospores from different locations of the Czech Republic (Dumalasová & Bartoš 2006, 2010a. Resistance to common bunt is often neglected because it is expected that bunt is eliminated by seed treatments.…”

Section: Disease Resistance Of Cerealsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sixty years of the Crop Research Institute and its impact on plant breeding

Prášil¹,

Chrpová²,

Stehno³

2011

Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resistance of winter wheat cultivars to common bunt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Wint. and T. laevis Kühn

Cited by 26 publications

References 4 publications

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Evaluation and managing wheat seed-borne diseases: Options and suggestions from the case of Tajikistan

Sixty years of the Crop Research Institute and its impact on plant breeding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About