2003
DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2003.87.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance of Geneva and Other Apple Rootstocks toErwinia amylovora

Abstract: When vigorously growing shoots of 49 different apple rootstocks grown in a greenhouse were inoculated with different strains of Erwinia amylovora, Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Ottawa 3, Malling 9, and Malling 26 were the most fire blight susceptible rootstocks and Geneva 11, Geneva 65, Geneva 16, Geneva 30, Pillnitzer Au51-11, Malling 7, and several breeding selections were the most resistant. Significant strain—rootstock interactions were observed in the amount of fire blight that resulted from inoculation. Field-grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of real‐time PCR to detect and identify E. amylovora in plant tissue has several advantages in comparison with previously described PCR assays. Quantitative detection is useful to estimate the growth of a pathogen in resistance studies with transgenic plants (Reynoird et al ., 1999; Hanke et al ., 2002; Hanke et al ., 2003) or after application of fireblight control agents such as Prohexadione Ca (Costa et al ., 2001) or in breeding programmes (Norelli et al ., 2003). Quantitative PCR could also be applied to estimate the extent of contamination with E. amylovora on fruits (Van der Zwet et al ., 1990) destined for export, particularly to countries without occurrence of fireblight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of real‐time PCR to detect and identify E. amylovora in plant tissue has several advantages in comparison with previously described PCR assays. Quantitative detection is useful to estimate the growth of a pathogen in resistance studies with transgenic plants (Reynoird et al ., 1999; Hanke et al ., 2002; Hanke et al ., 2003) or after application of fireblight control agents such as Prohexadione Ca (Costa et al ., 2001) or in breeding programmes (Norelli et al ., 2003). Quantitative PCR could also be applied to estimate the extent of contamination with E. amylovora on fruits (Van der Zwet et al ., 1990) destined for export, particularly to countries without occurrence of fireblight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). A great advantage of the Geneva® series of rootstocks is their high resistance to fire blight (Ervinia amylovora), (Cummins and Aldwickle, 1983;Norelli et al, 2003;Robinson et al, 2003;Baritt et al 2004). The control function was fulfilled by trees on M.9 T337, M.26, and M.9 Pajam 2 commonly used in apple tree production in Poland, Holland, England and France.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenge treatments consisted of transversally bisecting the first ten leaves from the shoot apex with scissors dipped in (1) a suspension of 1×10 9 colony forming units of E. amylovora strain Ea273 ml −1 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5 (E. amylovora-inoculated), prepared as per Norelli et al (2003), and (2) 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5 (mockinoculated). Leaf tissue samples were collected at 0.25, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-inoculation (hpi) from the first five inoculated leaves from the shoot apex on three replicate trees of both challenge treatments.…”
Section: Challenge Treatments and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%