Abstract:Viral diseases can spread through a variety of routes including aerosols. Yet, limited data are available on the efficacy of aerosolized chemicals to reduce viral loads in the air. Bacteriophages (phages) are often used as surrogates for hazardous viruses in aerosol studies because they are inexpensive, easy to handle, and safe for laboratory workers. Moreover, several of these bacterial viruses display physical characteristics similar to pathogenic human and animal viruses, like morphological size, type of nu… Show more
“…The results presented in [58], who used the same environmental chamber setup. The only notable difference is with φ6 at low RH, which did not become inactivated even after a 2-hour exposure to the reference conditions [45]. It remained infectious after a 6-hour and a 14-hour exposure, but there was more variability in RIR replicates [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Currently, there are no air treatment strategies available for inactivating airborne viruses during viral hospital outbreaks, which is due to the lack of approved protocols. UV light, ozone and disinfecting agents have been tested for airborne phage and virus inactivation [43][44][45][46], but none of them have led to the establishment of standardized air treatment protocols. In addition, they were used for short periods of time (� 1 minute) and many were at high concentrations that are toxic for humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model phages have been developed and used as surrogates for eukaryotic viruses [45,57,58] because they are easier to work with and are non-pathogenic to humans, requiring less extensive containment facilities. It is important to use multiple phages with different features (e.g.…”
This study was designed to test the efficacy of an air treatment using ozone and relative humidity (RH) for the inactivation of airborne viruses. Four phages (φX174, PR772, MS2 and φ6) and one eukaryotic virus (murine norovirus MNV-1) were exposed to low ozone concentrations (1.23 ppm for phages and 0.23 ppm for MNV-1) and various levels of RH for 10 to 70 minutes. The inactivation of these viruses was then assessed to determine which of the tested conditions provided the greatest reduction in virus infectivity. An inactivation of at least two orders of magnitude for φX174, MS2 and MNV-1 was achieved with an ozone exposure of 40 minutes at 85% RH. For PR772 and φ6, exposure to the reference condition at 20% RH for 10 minutes yielded the same results. These findings suggest that ozone used at a low concentration is a powerful disinfectant for airborne viruses when combined with a high RH.Air treatment could therefore be implemented inside hospital rooms ventilated naturally.
“…The results presented in [58], who used the same environmental chamber setup. The only notable difference is with φ6 at low RH, which did not become inactivated even after a 2-hour exposure to the reference conditions [45]. It remained infectious after a 6-hour and a 14-hour exposure, but there was more variability in RIR replicates [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Currently, there are no air treatment strategies available for inactivating airborne viruses during viral hospital outbreaks, which is due to the lack of approved protocols. UV light, ozone and disinfecting agents have been tested for airborne phage and virus inactivation [43][44][45][46], but none of them have led to the establishment of standardized air treatment protocols. In addition, they were used for short periods of time (� 1 minute) and many were at high concentrations that are toxic for humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model phages have been developed and used as surrogates for eukaryotic viruses [45,57,58] because they are easier to work with and are non-pathogenic to humans, requiring less extensive containment facilities. It is important to use multiple phages with different features (e.g.…”
This study was designed to test the efficacy of an air treatment using ozone and relative humidity (RH) for the inactivation of airborne viruses. Four phages (φX174, PR772, MS2 and φ6) and one eukaryotic virus (murine norovirus MNV-1) were exposed to low ozone concentrations (1.23 ppm for phages and 0.23 ppm for MNV-1) and various levels of RH for 10 to 70 minutes. The inactivation of these viruses was then assessed to determine which of the tested conditions provided the greatest reduction in virus infectivity. An inactivation of at least two orders of magnitude for φX174, MS2 and MNV-1 was achieved with an ozone exposure of 40 minutes at 85% RH. For PR772 and φ6, exposure to the reference condition at 20% RH for 10 minutes yielded the same results. These findings suggest that ozone used at a low concentration is a powerful disinfectant for airborne viruses when combined with a high RH.Air treatment could therefore be implemented inside hospital rooms ventilated naturally.
“…We selected a primer-probe set, set A, for PCR to robustly quantify phi-X174-specific airborne particles without being adversely affected by UV. Duchaine s research group had used another primer-probe set, set B Turgeon et al, 2014;Verreault et al, 2015;Turgeon et al, 2016. Ho et al 2016 had reported that the log reduction by UV of phi-X174 gene copies increased as the specific amplicon length for PCR increased.…”
Section: Behavior Analysis Of the Phage Aerosol At Different Levels Omentioning
Recent studies have investigated the efficacy of air-cleaning products against pathogens in the air. A standard method to evaluate the reduction in airborne viruses caused by an air cleaner has been established using a safe bacteriophage instead of pathogenic viruses; the reduction in airborne viruses is determined by counting the number of viable airborne phages by culture, after operating the air cleaner. The reduction in the number of viable airborne phages could be because of "physical decrease" or "inactivation". Therefore, to understand the mechanism of reduction correctly, an analysis is required to distinguish between physical decrease and inactivation. The purpose of this study was to design an analysis to distinguish between the physical decrease and inactivation of viable phi-X174 phages in aerosols. We established a suitable polymerase chain reaction PCR system by selecting an appropriate primer-probe set for PCR and validating the sensitivity, linearity, and specificity of the primer-probe set to robustly quantify phi-X174-specific airborne particles. Using this quantitative PCR system and culture assay, we performed a behavior analysis of the phage aerosol in a small chamber 1 m 3 at different levels of humidity, as humidity is known to affect the number of viable airborne phages. The results revealed that the reduction in the number of viable airborne phages was caused not only by physical decrease but also by inactivation under particular levels of humidity. Our study could provide an advanced analysis to differentiate between the physical decrease and inactivation of viable airborne phages.
“…Additionally, as viruses of bacteria, phages pose little risk to workers or animals when used in aerosolization tests for research purposes. PhiX174 is a single stranded DNA, non-enveloped, 25 nm bacteriophage that infects E. coli and has been previously used in aerosolization and ozonation experiments and has established propagation and quantification protocols (Tseng and Li 2006;Turgeon et al 2016;Turgeon et al 2014).…”
Ozone is effective against bacteria and viruses although its influence over bioaerosols is understudied and could be useful particularly in agricultural buildings such as swine confinement buildings. Ozone treatment of air within ventilation plenum could be applied for biosecurity purposes during the quarantine of incoming animals. In this study, a bacteriophage (PhiX174) was used as a surrogate for eukaryotic viruses in nebulization experiments inside a wind tunnel to study the factors that affect ozone's efficacy to reduce the virus. A tunnel system was installed in the workshop of a swine building with controlled relative humidity (40% and 80%), ozone concentration (0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 ppm), and exposure time (up to approximately 6 min) of PhiX174 nebulized. Although there was no effect of ozone on phage genomes, culturable phages were inactivated. There was a reduction of PhiX174 infectious ratios with increasing ozone concentrations and stronger effects of ozone observed at 80% relative humidity. The data suggests the potential success of a wind tunnel and ozone air treatment to control infectious viruses emitted from swine barns or quarantine buildings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.