Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2009)135:1(1)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance Factors for Use in Load and Resistance Factor Design of Driven Pipe Piles in Sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cone penetration test (CPT) has become a key tool in site characterisation, partly owing to its simplicity, and partly as a result of the development of cone resistance-based correlations for shallow foundation design (Schmertmann, 1970;Mayne & Poulos, 1999;Lee & Salgado, 2002;Lee et al, 2005;Foye et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2008;O'Loughlin & Lehane, 2010), pile design (Lee & Salgado, 1999;Lee et al, 2003;Jardine et al, 2005;Kolk et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2008;Foye et al, 2009;Seo et al, 2009;Niazi & Mayne, 2013) and liquefaction resistance estimation (Seed & De Alba, 1986;Stark & Olson, 1995;Salgado et al, 1997a;Robertson & Wride, 1998;Carraro et al, 2003;Idriss & Boulanger, 2006). The apparent simplicity of the CPT, however, hides considerably complex mechanics (Salgado, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cone penetration test (CPT) has become a key tool in site characterisation, partly owing to its simplicity, and partly as a result of the development of cone resistance-based correlations for shallow foundation design (Schmertmann, 1970;Mayne & Poulos, 1999;Lee & Salgado, 2002;Lee et al, 2005;Foye et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2008;O'Loughlin & Lehane, 2010), pile design (Lee & Salgado, 1999;Lee et al, 2003;Jardine et al, 2005;Kolk et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2008;Foye et al, 2009;Seo et al, 2009;Niazi & Mayne, 2013) and liquefaction resistance estimation (Seed & De Alba, 1986;Stark & Olson, 1995;Salgado et al, 1997a;Robertson & Wride, 1998;Carraro et al, 2003;Idriss & Boulanger, 2006). The apparent simplicity of the CPT, however, hides considerably complex mechanics (Salgado, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gavin and Lehane (2003) and Foye et al (2009) Figure 8 shows that  values mobilised by these piles depended on the mode of installation, with jacked piles developing much higher  av values. In contrast to the findings of Karlsrud and Haugen (1981), the degree of plugging experienced (quantified through PLR) strongly influenced the mobilised shaft resistance, with  increasing linearly as PLR reduced.…”
Section: Eqn 14mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The total shaft capacity measured in the static load tests was distributed along the pile shaft by first calculating the limit unit shaft resistance values using the method by Foye et al (2006) for displacement piles (Chapter 3) based on the sand relative density and the effective confining stress. Then, the computed limit unit shaft resistance distribution was scaled so that the corresponding shaft capacity matched the one observed in the pile load tests.…”
Section: Model Pile Load Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%