2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(16)01701-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance Analyses for Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Containing Regimens in Patients Infected with Chronic HCV who Have Advanced Liver Disease or are Post Liver Transplant (Solar-1 & 2 Studies)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, an analysis of more than 7800 NS5A and NS5B sequences from HCV-infected patients across 22 countries showed a prevalence of up to 34% for the L159F mutation in GT1b infected patients [ 33 ]. Several studies analyzing the natural presence of NS5B RASs equally refute an associated significant impact on SVR12 rates [ 49 , 50 ], which further strengthens this study’s data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, an analysis of more than 7800 NS5A and NS5B sequences from HCV-infected patients across 22 countries showed a prevalence of up to 34% for the L159F mutation in GT1b infected patients [ 33 ]. Several studies analyzing the natural presence of NS5B RASs equally refute an associated significant impact on SVR12 rates [ 49 , 50 ], which further strengthens this study’s data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Along these lines, baseline NS5 RASs seem to have minimal effects on patient responses to sofosbuvir plus NS5A inhibitors (LDV, DCV, VEL) based therapies. It is well established through cumulative research data that, when baseline NS5A RASs in particular do have effects, they could be largely overcome by extending treatment duration and/or through treatment intensification with the addition of RBV, which drastically reduced the impact of NS5A baseline RASs [ 25 , 49 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of baseline resistance testing was accessed in a recent paper describing how the inquiry of baseline NS5A RASs prior to treatment with EBR/GZR is a cost-effective measure resulting in more QALYs (quality-adjusted life years) among GT1a treatment-naive or treatment-experienced patients when compared to a treatment with EBR/GZR without baseline resistance testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrary to this result, in a UNITY-1 study, despite the higher frequency of NS5A RASs was observed prior to treatment in GT1b compared to GT1a infected patients (16% vs 11%), all subjects with GT1b infection achieved SVR in contrast to only 74% for GT1a [95,96].Nevertheless, a recent study showed an exciting result that the impact of baseline NS5A RASs on outcome of treatment can be significantly reduced or even completely removed when patients go through a longer duration of treatment with SOF + LDV and addition of RBV [96]. Furthermore, pre-existing RASs in NS5A appeared to have little effect on the outcome of treatment regimen with SOF + VEL, in spite of a high frequency of such variants, 97-100% subjects with baseline resistance in NS5A achieved SVR [97,98].…”
Section: Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 50% of the patients that had two or more baseline resistance‐related variants cleared the virus, with the lowest SVR rates observed with variant Y93H/N . A recent study showed that a longer duration of treatment with SOF + LDV and addition of RBV can reduce or even eliminate the impact of baseline NS5A RAVs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%