1979
DOI: 10.1061/tpejan.0000772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tuan & Chieu: The Effect of Moisture and Fine Grain Content on the Resilient Modulus of Sandy … pressure, lateral pressure, and lateral compression strength [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: B Factors Affecting Resilient Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuan & Chieu: The Effect of Moisture and Fine Grain Content on the Resilient Modulus of Sandy … pressure, lateral pressure, and lateral compression strength [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: B Factors Affecting Resilient Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the stress-dependent model by Uzan [63] applies to both coarse-grained and fine-grained soils [53]. The model includes both the increment of resilient modulus with bulk stress and the reduction with an increase in the deviator stress for the coarse-grained and fine-grained soils, respectively [56,64]. The resilient modulus is a measure of the elastic stiffness of the geomaterials used for the construction of the track substructure [52].…”
Section: Empirical Models For Resilient Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arithmetic or bilinear model was used in the analysis to define the load-response behavior of the CH subgrade. A standard model for a soft soil based upon the work of Thompson and Robnett ( 6 ) for a similar soil and presented in Huang ( 7 ) was used in the analysis. The coefficients of earth pressure at rest (K 0 ) for the granular materials were estimated from Jaky’s equation, while the coefficient for the CH subgrade was estimated from Brooker and Ireland’s ( 8 ) equation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Reinforced Unpaved Roadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the ILLIPAVE 2005 analyses, the arithmetic or bilinear model was used in the analyses to define the load-response behavior of the CH subgrade. As previously noted, a standard model for a similar soft soil based upon the work of Thompson and Robnett ( 6 ) was used in the analyses because of inconsistencies in the resilient modulus data for the CH resulting from deformation during testing. Figures 7 and 8 show screen captures of the GT_PAVE input screens.…”
Section: Analysis Of Reinforced Unpaved Roadsmentioning
confidence: 99%