2018
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.10.000613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient Intersection-Ring Architecture Featuring Online Expansion and Intersectional Mutual Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are usually contradictory because the improvement of reliability depends on backing up or sharing the existing resources and thus increasing the additional construction cost. In contrast to previous studies based on pure optical protection [9]- [13], [15], [16], [33], [34], [40], [48] and based on wireless protection [21]- [25], [29], [30], our study can enhance the reliability performance for metro-access optical networks based on the WDM technique while reducing the additional construction cost and the expenditure of each subscriber. For example, previous studies [21]- [23] based on survivable WOBAN architecture have the limitation that they are not suitable for fault scenarios that require recovering significant losses of data, such as a fault in the feeder segment and even a fault in the distribution section of the WDM network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These are usually contradictory because the improvement of reliability depends on backing up or sharing the existing resources and thus increasing the additional construction cost. In contrast to previous studies based on pure optical protection [9]- [13], [15], [16], [33], [34], [40], [48] and based on wireless protection [21]- [25], [29], [30], our study can enhance the reliability performance for metro-access optical networks based on the WDM technique while reducing the additional construction cost and the expenditure of each subscriber. For example, previous studies [21]- [23] based on survivable WOBAN architecture have the limitation that they are not suitable for fault scenarios that require recovering significant losses of data, such as a fault in the feeder segment and even a fault in the distribution section of the WDM network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For the protection of the distribution segment, we set two ONUs belonging to adjacent RNs for each ONU as protective ONUs to recover the affected traffic by utilizing established microwave connectivity when a distribution-fiber fault occurs. This scheme can achieve network reliability of more than 99.9999%, which is superior to that of some existing schemes [9], [10], [12], [13], [15], [33], [40], [48]. Furthermore, in contrast to [11], [16], [30] and [34], the proposed scheme can support protection from more types of faults, including single-fiber faults, dual-fiber faults and multifiber faults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations