2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2019.2924235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient Consensus Through Event-Based Communication

Abstract: We consider resilient versions of discrete-time multiagent consensus in the presence of faulty or even malicious agents in the network. In particular, we develop event-triggered update rules which can mitigate the influence of the malicious agents and at the same time reduce the communication. Each regular agent updates its state based on a given rule using its neighbors' information. Only when the triggering condition is satisfied, the regular agents send their current states to their neighbors. Otherwise, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resilient consensus algorithms developed in this paper follow the basic approach from [5,6,16]. We present two resilient algorithms that can be seen as extensions of our recent work [25], which dealt with the real-valued states case. The main difference in the algorithms is that those for the quantized case are based on randomization due to the use of the probabilistic quantizer.…”
Section: Definition 23 (F-total)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resilient consensus algorithms developed in this paper follow the basic approach from [5,6,16]. We present two resilient algorithms that can be seen as extensions of our recent work [25], which dealt with the real-valued states case. The main difference in the algorithms is that those for the quantized case are based on randomization due to the use of the probabilistic quantizer.…”
Section: Definition 23 (F-total)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved that the resilient consensus can be ensured if the communication topology satisfies a newly proposed graphic condition (f + 1, f + 1)-robustness/(2f + 1, 1)-robustness. From then on, the resilient consensus problem has been explored in different contexts, including double-integrator dynamics [30], communication delays [28], time-varying topologies [34], asynchronous networks [33], event-triggered communications [35], quantization [29], and differential privacy requirements [36]. All of the above-mentioned works on resilient consensus require the same graphic conditions as [32], where the highly connected communication topology is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the networked systems, typical tasks, e.g., consensus [1], [2] and formation [3], [4], have been well studied, whereas here, we consider a different task, namely distributed spatial filtering (DSF). In this task, the nodes obtain signal values with a desired spatial frequency characteristic from given ones only through local communications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%