2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72016-2_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient Capacity-Aware Routing

Abstract: To ensure a high availability, communication networks provide resilient routing mechanisms that quickly change routes upon failures. However, a fundamental algorithmic question underlying such mechanisms is hardly understood: how to verify whether a given network reroutes flows along feasible paths, without violating capacity constraints, for up to k link failures? We chart the algorithmic complexity landscape of resilient routing under link failures, considering shortest path routing based on link weights as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it would be interesting to chart a similar landscape for the practically relevant scenarios in which links failures are random, or where the routing rules themselves can be subject to randomization. It would further be interesting to account for additional aspects which influence dependability in practice, and e.g., optimize the "hazard value" [53], [54] of the network more generally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it would be interesting to chart a similar landscape for the practically relevant scenarios in which links failures are random, or where the routing rules themselves can be subject to randomization. It would further be interesting to account for additional aspects which influence dependability in practice, and e.g., optimize the "hazard value" [53], [54] of the network more generally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper accounts for the physical topology explicitly, among other properties, and we model the routing with constraints. Our approach is hence orthogonal to work on resilient routing mechanisms [25]. It is also orthogonal to work studying how to verify and maintain routing and policy constraints under failures [17], [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%