Abstract:Growing national concern about the increase in Black youth's suicide rates has led to calls for closer examinations of disparities in young people's mental health outcomes and their underlying causes, including differences in access to healthcare and willingness to use mental health services, and systemic inequities. The present research brief answers this call through a critical analysis of racial discrimination and other adverse mechanisms that perpetuate negative mental health outcomes for Black youth. Our … Show more
“…The social-ecological perspective states that schools can utilize direct and indirect strategies to enhance positive adaptation for children and families (Masten & Motti-Stefanidi, 2020; Ungar, 2011). Directly, schools can utilize school-wide interventions and prevention programs aimed at disseminating an anti-bias curriculum, restorative justice practices, or a school-wide culturally tailored resilience curriculum that highlights the impact of systems on educational outcomes, cultural strengths, and empowerment (Darling-Hammond et al, 2020; Elisha & Collins, 2022; Graham et al, 2017; Richards et al, 2016). Indirectly, school resilience strategies may include fostering relationships between school staff, students, and their families, providing safe learning environments and safe spaces in schools for discussing race and identity, and engaging in culturally responsive teaching and classroom management practices (Amemiya & Wang, 2018; Austin et al, 2022; Brady et al, 2014; Gale, 2020; Goodwin & Long, 2022; Kelly, 2018; Theron, 2016).…”
African American families navigate not only everyday stressors and adversities but also unique sociocultural stressors (e.g., “toxic upstream waters” like oppression). These adverse conditions are consequences of the historical vestiges of slavery and Jim Crow laws, often manifested as inequities in wealth, housing, wages, employment, access to healthcare, and quality education. Despite these challenges, African American families have developed resilience using strength-based adaptive coping strategies, to some extent, to filter these waters. To advance the field of resilience research, we focused on the following questions: (1) what constitutes positive responses to adversity?; (2) how is resilience defined conceptually and measured operationally?; (3) how has the field of resilience evolved?; (4) who defines what, when, and how responses are manifestations of resilience, instead of, for example, resistance? How can resistance, which at times leads to positive adaptations, be incorporated into the study of resilience?; and (5) are there case examples that demonstrate ways to address structural oppression and the pernicious effects of racism through system-level interventions, thereby changing environmental situations that sustain toxic waters requiring acts of resilience to survive and thrive? We end by exploring how a re-conceptualization of resilience requires a paradigm shift and new methodological approaches to understand ways in which preventive interventions move beyond focusing on families’ capacity to navigate oppression and target systems and structures that maintain these toxic waters.
“…The social-ecological perspective states that schools can utilize direct and indirect strategies to enhance positive adaptation for children and families (Masten & Motti-Stefanidi, 2020; Ungar, 2011). Directly, schools can utilize school-wide interventions and prevention programs aimed at disseminating an anti-bias curriculum, restorative justice practices, or a school-wide culturally tailored resilience curriculum that highlights the impact of systems on educational outcomes, cultural strengths, and empowerment (Darling-Hammond et al, 2020; Elisha & Collins, 2022; Graham et al, 2017; Richards et al, 2016). Indirectly, school resilience strategies may include fostering relationships between school staff, students, and their families, providing safe learning environments and safe spaces in schools for discussing race and identity, and engaging in culturally responsive teaching and classroom management practices (Amemiya & Wang, 2018; Austin et al, 2022; Brady et al, 2014; Gale, 2020; Goodwin & Long, 2022; Kelly, 2018; Theron, 2016).…”
African American families navigate not only everyday stressors and adversities but also unique sociocultural stressors (e.g., “toxic upstream waters” like oppression). These adverse conditions are consequences of the historical vestiges of slavery and Jim Crow laws, often manifested as inequities in wealth, housing, wages, employment, access to healthcare, and quality education. Despite these challenges, African American families have developed resilience using strength-based adaptive coping strategies, to some extent, to filter these waters. To advance the field of resilience research, we focused on the following questions: (1) what constitutes positive responses to adversity?; (2) how is resilience defined conceptually and measured operationally?; (3) how has the field of resilience evolved?; (4) who defines what, when, and how responses are manifestations of resilience, instead of, for example, resistance? How can resistance, which at times leads to positive adaptations, be incorporated into the study of resilience?; and (5) are there case examples that demonstrate ways to address structural oppression and the pernicious effects of racism through system-level interventions, thereby changing environmental situations that sustain toxic waters requiring acts of resilience to survive and thrive? We end by exploring how a re-conceptualization of resilience requires a paradigm shift and new methodological approaches to understand ways in which preventive interventions move beyond focusing on families’ capacity to navigate oppression and target systems and structures that maintain these toxic waters.
“…Developmental science is currently in a replicability crisis where questions about the trustworthiness of data dominate (Barbot et al, 2020). Black psychology was partially founded to address the trustworthiness of data on Black children and adults, thus for many Black psychologists, the resonating question about the field’s future is “How can we not trust or listen to the data?” With extensive documentation of Black Americans being worse off than their non-Black counterparts, regardless of SES, on most indicators of social, economic, and physiological well-being (see Simons et al, 2018), Black psychologists have long argued for the need to address extant data in ways that advance social change (Elisha & Collins, 2022; McLoyd, 2019).…”
Section: Moving Forward For An Inclusive and Equitable Developmental ...mentioning
Over the past century, Black American scholars have designed, applied, and promoted conceptual frameworks and research models that propose nuanced understandings of psychological development. This article highlights examples of their contributions to understanding the differential impact of diverse contextual and situational factors. Through examinations of the psychological effects of Blackness on the development of cognition, competence, identity, and social functioning, Black psychologists outline pathways and provide tools for ecological culturally rooted methodologies. These multidisciplinary approaches run in contrast to dominant trends in the field and thus broaden developmental science's reach and influence. In the 1950s, developmental research by Black psychologists was instrumental to the fight for civil rights. Today, it continues to provide a basis for advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice.
Public Significance StatementRecent calls for representation, discussions of systemic issues, and closer attention to the mental health of Black Americans highlight the need for renewed attention to the contributions Black scholars have made to our understanding of how culture and context impact lived experiences. This article outlines how Black scholars have designed, applied, and promoted nuanced approaches to the study of human growth and development. Research by Black scholars was foundational to the fight for civil rights and continues to provide a basis for advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.