2022
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.833081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience to Historical Human Manipulations in the Genomic Variation of Italian Wild Boar Populations

Abstract: Human activities can globally modify natural ecosystems determining ecological, demographic and range perturbations for several animal species. These changes can jeopardize native gene pools in different ways, leading either to genetic homogenization, or conversely, to the split into genetically divergent demes. In the past decades, most European wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations were heavily managed by humans. Anthropic manipulations have strongly affected also Italian populations through heavy hunting, tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2) was difficult to ascertain through detection of introgressed haplotypes. Either the signal is a type-I error and pig hybridization is infrequent (in line with findings for Italian wild boar by Scandura et al 2022) or pig hybridization has been so frequent and long-lasting that introgressed segments are too short to detect with medium density SNP data. Both Iberia and Italy share a long tradition of extensive pig herding for regional ham production, up to the present, that possibly has led to a prolonged gene-flow between the wild boar and domestic pigs (Herrero-Medrano et al 2013;Canu et al 2014;Iacolina et al 2016;Maselli et al 2016).…”
Section: Anthropogenic Influencessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…S2) was difficult to ascertain through detection of introgressed haplotypes. Either the signal is a type-I error and pig hybridization is infrequent (in line with findings for Italian wild boar by Scandura et al 2022) or pig hybridization has been so frequent and long-lasting that introgressed segments are too short to detect with medium density SNP data. Both Iberia and Italy share a long tradition of extensive pig herding for regional ham production, up to the present, that possibly has led to a prolonged gene-flow between the wild boar and domestic pigs (Herrero-Medrano et al 2013;Canu et al 2014;Iacolina et al 2016;Maselli et al 2016).…”
Section: Anthropogenic Influencessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The dataset we analyzed here was taken from publicly available data (Iacolina et al 2016 ; Yang et al 2017 ; Scandura et al 2022 ), comprising various WB, DP, and outgroup species, all genotyped with the Illumina Porcine SNP60 Beadchip (Ramos et al 2009 ), that is mapped onto the pig reference genome Sscrofa10.2 (Groenen et al 2012 ). In particular, we selected the SarWB samples, together with a reference set of commercial European pig breeds (Berkshire (BK), Duroc (DU), Large White (LW), Pietrain (PI), Yorkshire (YO), Sardinian local pigs (SarDP)), and Italian WB that are assumed to be free of recent domestic introgression (ItaWB), and finally an outgroup — here represented by S. barbatus (SB; Bornean bearded pig).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving the individuals into non-native range distributions, potentially alarming situations could arise for both the environment and the indigenous fauna and flora, where boar are invasive [17,43,67,[211][212][213][214][215][216]. Indeed, allochthonous individuals more easily could invade ecological niches unattended by indigenous populations.…”
Section: Moving the Animals Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%